Update RHEL10 packages - #1935
Conversation
|
@bastelfreak Can you please review? |
| when /el-8/ | ||
| RHEL8_PACKAGES | ||
| when /el-9/ | ||
| when /el-(9|10)/ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Does it make sense to stay future proof and match on el9 and any newer version? With a bit of luck we won't have to touch it again on EL11.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is the 4.x branch. In master it's already future proof via 18e6e22, which was part of 6.4.0.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@bastelfreak , @ekohl could someone please take a look at this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do you actually need this in the beaker 4 branch? Can't you update to latest? It not, can you try to cherry-pick 18e6e22?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
#1853 had quite a few prerequisites to get the tests to pass so I'd be fine with updating this branch in a minimal way. However, I do agree people should upgrade to the latest Beaker branch.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do you actually need this in the beaker 4 branch? Can't you update to latest? It not, can you try to cherry-pick 18e6e22?
Hi @bastelfreak , Yes we need this in 4.x. It might take some time to upgrade to beaker latest.
11212b0 to
31cea67
Compare
4 participants
This is to use chrony as RHEL 10 failing with installing
ntpdate