Write a bit about modular form#248
Conversation
|
Is there a plan to add more chapters in the modular forms part? If not (which is fine), then I think it might make more sense to not have a separate part just for this and merge it into the previous complex analysis section. If there are more chapters planned, then I might rather wait until some more of those are written out to merge, so the chapter numbers don't keep jiggling around too much. I'm a little reluctant to add input macros.tex because it makes the Asymptote code more brittle and less portable. I think it's not worth the extra dependency link if the only cost to not having it is having |
|
We wait then. |
|
Oh, cool. I'm currently (re)reading Napkin to brush up my number theory (and prepare for more advanced literature), and modular forms are on my roadmap soon. Happy to see this PR. I don't know enough to say anything substantial about the content, but when adding a new part you probably also want to add it here: https://github.com/vEnhance/napkin/blob/main/tex/frontmatter/digraph.tex. I assume complex analysis is a prerequisite. Btw, I chuckled at the unintentional humor of
(I know that's in comparison to the regular definition, but it made me think of the monad joke) |
Another guest chapter, I guess.
There's a few things to look out for:
macros.tex, which results in\Reappears as\operatorname{Re}instead ofℜ. I think this is more convenient, but it leads to each Asymptote file takes like 0.02 seconds longer. I think this is negligible (remember to not add heavy packages tomacros.texthen, otherwise total compilation time for all the Asymptote figures will blow up)macros.textopreamble.tex. Otherwise Asymptote compilation time would be like 1 second longer per figure.Feel free to revert these (but if you do then change
\Re/Imto\operatorname{Re/Im}in the plot).If it's accepted I guess some
\mathscr{P}can be changed to\PPin the category theory chapter (Cohen forcing), and maybe some\operatornamecan be changed to\opnameelsewhere.I feel I didn't do modular form enough justice, I guess. https://www.quantamagazine.org/behold-modular-forms-the-fifth-fundamental-operation-of-math-20230921/ has a good introduction (except the relation to lattice which I can't really find in any source…), I can't really write that well.
there are some parts of commentary that I comment out… it is not your opinion though.
I guess I could add "for evanchen's actual writing, see 18-786 number theory II course notes". The 10 pages I wrote is worth about 3 pages of course notes, I guess.
TODO: