Skip to content

Initial CI work to support Python 3.8#118

Open
tmontes wants to merge 13 commits into
masterfrom
support-py38
Open

Initial CI work to support Python 3.8#118
tmontes wants to merge 13 commits into
masterfrom
support-py38

Conversation

@tmontes

@tmontes tmontes commented Sep 3, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Addresses #117.

@tmontes tmontes added this to the NEXT milestone Sep 3, 2019
@tmontes tmontes mentioned this pull request Sep 3, 2019
3 tasks
@codecov-io

codecov-io commented Sep 3, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #118 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #118    +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage     100%   100%            
======================================
  Files          22     18     -4     
  Lines         871    694   -177     
  Branches       56     26    -30     
======================================
- Hits          871    694   -177
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
tests/helpers.py 100% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
tests/mixin_use_new_instance.py 100% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
tests/mixin_use_shared_instance.py 100% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
src/wires/_callable.py
src/wires/__init__.py
src/wires/_wires.py
src/wires/_shared.py

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d615130...b2d22fa. Read the comment docs.

@tmontes

tmontes commented Sep 3, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

How nice of Travis (or GitHub? or both?):

@tmontes

tmontes commented Sep 3, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

PROGRESS:

  • Travis migration from "webhook" to "application" is either non-trivial, or either party is acting up...
  • After disabling the old "webhook" travis.org and enabling/installing the new "application" travis.com thing, Travis is complaining that it can't see this repository. :/

NEXT:

  • Let's wait a while and see if there might be some kind of queued up job that will, at some point in the near future, make Travis "see" what it needs to see.
  • Then, we can re-enable the branch protection to depend on Travis checks.

sigh!

@tmontes

tmontes commented Nov 20, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

PROGRESS:

  • Having lots of trouble making travis-ci.com see this project / migrate it from travis-ci.org.
  • KISSing by running all tests on Azure Pipelines (thanks MS).

@tmontes

tmontes commented Nov 20, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

NEXT:

  • Without Travis, no information is being pushed to codecov.io.
  • Can we make Azure Pipelines do that for us? Idea:
    • pip install codecov
    • codecov -t <codecov-side-token>

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants