Skip to content

docs: record stalled Firstmate lane recovery - #62

Merged
ruby-dlee merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fm/firstmate-stalled-lanes
Aug 1, 2026
Merged

docs: record stalled Firstmate lane recovery#62
ruby-dlee merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fm/firstmate-stalled-lanes

Conversation

@ruby-dlee

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Intent

Recover five stranded Firstmate branches after their workers were killed, without discarding work. Inventory every lane before mutation; preserve and publish all real uncommitted and disk-only commits; explicitly classify rollback scratch before cleaning it; open or confirm pull requests for review; deliberately close the detached rules lane when its exact head is already in an open PR; never merge, force-push, rewrite gate-tracked history, drop a stash, or run the full local test suite. Ship a durable short recovery report through review, lint, push, PR, and GitHub CI, skipping only the unsafe local full-test step.

What Changed

  • Add a durable recovery report covering the initial inventory and final disposition of five stalled Firstmate lanes.
  • Document preserved commits, published branches, confirmed or opened pull requests, and the deliberately closed detached rules lane.
  • Record rollback-scratch cleanup, verification results, and the intentionally omitted unsafe full local test suite.

Risk Assessment

✅ Low: The change is a well-bounded recovery report that records all five lane inventories and dispositions, matches the required preservation and prohibition constraints, and has externally confirmed PR/head claims.

Testing

  • ⏭️ Test - skipped

Pipeline

Updates from git push no-mistakes

✅ **intent** - passed

✅ No issues found.

✅ **Rebase** - passed

✅ No issues found.

✅ **Review** - passed

✅ No issues found.

⏭️ **Test** - skipped

Step was skipped.

✅ **Document** - passed

✅ No issues found.

✅ **Lint** - passed

✅ No issues found.

✅ **Push** - passed

✅ No issues found.

@ruby-dlee
ruby-dlee merged commit e086345 into main Aug 1, 2026
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant