Document managed Trrack provenance migration#253
Draft
JackWilb wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
|
A preview of 46da660 is uploaded and can be seen here: Changes may take a few minutes to propagate. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
useRevisitTrrackfor React stimuli andRevisit.createTrrackfor website/iframe stimuliinitializeTrrackplussetAnswer({ provenanceGraph })andRevisit.postProvenanceImplementation source of truth:
revisit-studies/studybranchcodex/issue-659-managed-trrack.Validation
yarn typecheckyarn buildyarn checkLinks(all links introduced here pass; the command still reports two pre-existing external 404s inblog/2026-04-30-llm-in-revisit.md)Generated TypeDoc remains release-managed from the app repository, per this docs repository's contribution guidance.