Skip to content

docs: cross-link new ITS sensitivity walkthrough#877

Closed
drbenvincent wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/788-its-sensitivity-walkthrough
Closed

docs: cross-link new ITS sensitivity walkthrough#877
drbenvincent wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/788-its-sensitivity-walkthrough

Conversation

@drbenvincent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Two small follow-ups to PR #821 to improve discoverability of the new ITS sensitivity walkthrough.

Summary

  • docs/source/notebooks/sensitivity_checks.md: add its_post_intervention_analysis to the "Where examples already exist" list (under both PlaceboInTime and PersistenceCheck) and to the closing :::{seealso} block.
  • docs/source/notebooks/its_pymc.ipynb: add a closing "Going further: sensitivity checks" markdown section pointing readers to the central guide, the worked walkthrough, and the pipeline tutorial.

This is the polish pass agreed on in #788 — we deliberately avoided propagating the full sensitivity walkthrough to every ITS variant to prevent boilerplate duplication and pedagogical dilution.

Test plan

  • prek run --files docs/source/notebooks/sensitivity_checks.md docs/source/notebooks/its_pymc.ipynb — all hooks pass (notebook schema, ruff format, codespell, etc.)
  • its_pymc.ipynb re-executed end-to-end in the CausalPy conda env so committed outputs are fresh
  • RTD preview renders the new "Going further" section and updated seealso links resolve

Refs #788

Made with Cursor

Two small follow-ups to PR #821 to improve discoverability of the
ITS sensitivity walkthrough now hosted in
its_post_intervention_analysis.ipynb:

- sensitivity_checks.md: add the walkthrough to the "Where examples
  already exist" list (PlaceboInTime + PersistenceCheck) and to the
  bottom :::{seealso} block.
- its_pymc.ipynb: add a closing "Going further: sensitivity checks"
  section pointing to the central guide and the worked walkthrough.

Re-executed its_pymc.ipynb in the CausalPy env so committed outputs
reflect the new structure.

Refs #788

Made-with: Cursor
@drbenvincent drbenvincent added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation OSS_PRODUCT OSS_PRODUCT project priorities. Labs members should get approval before logging hours. labels Apr 30, 2026
@review-notebook-app

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Apr 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 94.59%. Comparing base (deb8774) to head (b0bc796).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #877      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.60%   94.59%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          80       80              
  Lines       12764    12764              
  Branches      770      770              
==========================================
- Hits        12076    12074       -2     
- Misses        485      486       +1     
- Partials      203      204       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@read-the-docs-community

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Documentation build overview

📚 causalpy | 🛠️ Build #32483877 | 📁 Comparing b0bc796 against latest (deb8774)

  🔍 Preview build  

3 files changed
± 404.html
± notebooks/its_pymc.html
± notebooks/sensitivity_checks.html

@drbenvincent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Closing in favour of folding these polish edits directly into #821, where they live more naturally. Same commit (babdd2a) is now on the issue-788-its-sensitivity-walkthrough branch — see babdd2a.

@drbenvincent drbenvincent deleted the docs/788-its-sensitivity-walkthrough branch April 30, 2026 12:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation OSS_PRODUCT OSS_PRODUCT project priorities. Labs members should get approval before logging hours.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant