Update mock paths to fix flakey android build Null Pointer Exception

[KetanReddy]

Remove src from A2UI mocks path as it seems to cause an occasional NPE on Android

Change Type (required)

Indicate the type of change your pull request is:

• patch
• minor
• major
• N/A

Does your PR have any documentation updates?

• Updated docs
• No Update needed
• Unable to update docs

---

_{Stack created with GitHub Stacks CLI • Give Feedback 💬}

[intuit-svc]

Benchmark Results

Comparison against baseline from main. ⚠️ = regression (>10% slower), ✅ = improvement (>5% faster)

core/player ⚠️

Benchmark	Current	Baseline	Change
core/player/src/binding/__tests__/parser.bench.ts > parser benchmarks > Resolving binding: foo.bar	551.13K ops/s	498.13K ops/s	+10.6% ✅
core/player/src/binding/__tests__/parser.bench.ts > parser benchmarks > Resolving binding: foo.pets.1.name	446.29K ops/s	298.47K ops/s	+49.5% ✅
core/player/src/binding/__tests__/parser.bench.ts > parser benchmarks > Resolving binding: foo.pets.01.name	497.32K ops/s	322.55K ops/s	+54.2% ✅
core/player/src/binding/__tests__/parser.bench.ts > parser benchmarks > Resolving binding: foo.pets['01'].name	460.78K ops/s	433.46K ops/s	+6.3% ✅
core/player/src/binding/__tests__/parser.bench.ts > parser benchmarks > Resolving binding: foo.pets[01].name	369.24K ops/s	433.53K ops/s	-14.8% ⚠️
core/player/src/binding/__tests__/parser.bench.ts > parser benchmarks > Resolving binding: foo.pets[name = "frodo"].type	280.37K ops/s	264.95K ops/s	+5.8% ✅
core/player/src/binding/__tests__/parser.bench.ts > parser benchmarks > Resolving binding: foo.pets["name" = "sprinkles"].type	207.08K ops/s	224.33K ops/s	-7.7%
core/player/src/binding/__tests__/parser.bench.ts > parser benchmarks > Resolving binding: foo.pets["isDog" = false].type	290.96K ops/s	275.54K ops/s	+5.6% ✅
core/player/src/binding/__tests__/parser.bench.ts > parser benchmarks > Resolving binding: foo.pets["isDog" = true].type	295.49K ops/s	293.98K ops/s	+0.5%
core/player/src/binding/__tests__/parser.bench.ts > binding creation benchmarks > Resolving binding: foo.bar	576.32K ops/s	606.45K ops/s	-5.0%
core/player/src/binding/__tests__/parser.bench.ts > binding creation benchmarks > Resolving binding: foo.pets.1.name	370.04K ops/s	397.22K ops/s	-6.8%
core/player/src/binding/__tests__/parser.bench.ts > binding creation benchmarks > Resolving binding: foo.pets.01.name	366.57K ops/s	388.79K ops/s	-5.7%
core/player/src/binding/__tests__/parser.bench.ts > binding creation benchmarks > Resolving binding: foo.pets['01'].name	349.86K ops/s	342.25K ops/s	+2.2%
core/player/src/binding/__tests__/parser.bench.ts > binding creation benchmarks > Resolving binding: foo.pets[01].name	389.35K ops/s	290.56K ops/s	+34.0% ✅
core/player/src/binding/__tests__/parser.bench.ts > binding creation benchmarks > Resolving binding: foo.pets[name = "frodo"].type	245.43K ops/s	197.83K ops/s	+24.1% ✅
core/player/src/binding/__tests__/parser.bench.ts > binding creation benchmarks > Resolving binding: foo.pets["name" = "sprinkles"].type	196.71K ops/s	134.56K ops/s	+46.2% ✅
core/player/src/binding/__tests__/parser.bench.ts > binding creation benchmarks > Resolving binding: foo.pets["isDog" = false].type	245.85K ops/s	188.71K ops/s	+30.3% ✅
core/player/src/binding/__tests__/parser.bench.ts > binding creation benchmarks > Resolving binding: foo.pets["isDog" = true].type	251.51K ops/s	209.10K ops/s	+20.3% ✅
core/player/src/expressions/__tests__/performance.bench.ts > Expression Parsing/Execution Benchmark > Parsing: {{foo}} = 1 + 3 (sync)	267.83K ops/s	360.37K ops/s	-25.7% ⚠️
core/player/src/expressions/__tests__/performance.bench.ts > Expression Parsing/Execution Benchmark > Parsing: {{foo}} = 1 + 3 (async)	241.47K ops/s	302.45K ops/s	-20.2% ⚠️
core/player/src/expressions/__tests__/performance.bench.ts > Expression Parsing/Execution Benchmark > Parsing: conditional(true, true, false) (sync)	303.78K ops/s	299.54K ops/s	+1.4%
core/player/src/expressions/__tests__/performance.bench.ts > Expression Parsing/Execution Benchmark > Parsing: conditional(true, true, false) (async)	271.45K ops/s	365.52K ops/s	-25.7% ⚠️
core/player/src/expressions/__tests__/performance.bench.ts > Expression Parsing/Execution Benchmark > Parsing: {{foo}} = conditional({{bar}} > 0, true, false) (sync)	129.54K ops/s	199.36K ops/s	-35.0% ⚠️
core/player/src/expressions/__tests__/performance.bench.ts > Expression Parsing/Execution Benchmark > Parsing: {{foo}} = conditional({{bar}} > 0, true, false) (async)	114.58K ops/s	160.97K ops/s	-28.8% ⚠️
core/player/src/expressions/__tests__/performance.bench.ts > Expression Parsing/Execution Benchmark > Parsing: {{foo}} = conditional(conditional(true = false, false, true), conditional(false = false, true, false), conditional(true = true, false, true)) (sync)	110.00K ops/s	126.03K ops/s	-12.7% ⚠️
core/player/src/expressions/__tests__/performance.bench.ts > Expression Parsing/Execution Benchmark > Parsing: {{foo}} = conditional(conditional(true = false, false, true), conditional(false = false, true, false), conditional(true = true, false, true)) (async)	96.90K ops/s	87.18K ops/s	+11.1% ✅
core/player/src/expressions/__tests__/performance.bench.ts > Expression Parsing/Execution Benchmark > Parsing: {{foo}} = await(asyncTestFunction(1)) (sync)	N/A	N/A	N/A
core/player/src/expressions/__tests__/performance.bench.ts > Expression Parsing/Execution Benchmark > Parsing: {{foo}} = await(asyncTestFunction(1)) (async)	188.92K ops/s	170.69K ops/s	+10.7% ✅
core/player/src/expressions/__tests__/performance.bench.ts > Expression Parsing/Execution Benchmark > Parsing: {{foo}} = asyncTestFunction(1) (sync)	247.37K ops/s	250.80K ops/s	-1.4%
core/player/src/expressions/__tests__/performance.bench.ts > Expression Parsing/Execution Benchmark > Parsing: {{foo}} = asyncTestFunction(1) (async)	196.57K ops/s	190.72K ops/s	+3.1%
core/player/src/expressions/__tests__/performance.bench.ts > Expression Parsing/Execution Benchmark > Parsing: asyncTestFunction(1) (sync)	570.64K ops/s	491.49K ops/s	+16.1% ✅
core/player/src/expressions/__tests__/performance.bench.ts > Expression Parsing/Execution Benchmark > Parsing: asyncTestFunction(1) (async)	466.47K ops/s	376.51K ops/s	+23.9% ✅
core/player/src/expressions/__tests__/performance.bench.ts > Expression Parsing/Execution Benchmark > Parsing: {{foo}} = conditional(!{{bar}} == false, await(asyncTestFunction(1)), false) (sync)	119.00K ops/s	116.36K ops/s	+2.3%
core/player/src/expressions/__tests__/performance.bench.ts > Expression Parsing/Execution Benchmark > Parsing: {{foo}} = conditional(!{{bar}} == false, await(asyncTestFunction(1)), false) (async)	113.01K ops/s	116.39K ops/s	-2.9%
core/player/src/view/resolver/__tests__/index.bench.ts > resolver benchmarks > initial resolve	623.63 ops/s	465.08 ops/s	+34.1% ✅
core/player/src/view/resolver/__tests__/index.bench.ts > resolver benchmarks > Resolving from cache	16.47K ops/s	15.40K ops/s	+7.0% ✅
core/player/src/view/resolver/__tests__/index.bench.ts > resolver benchmarks > data changes	1.81K ops/s	2.68K ops/s	-32.4% ⚠️
core/player/src/view/resolver/__tests__/index.bench.ts > resolver benchmarks > data changes slow	163.84 ops/s	524.50 ops/s	-68.8% ⚠️

plugins/async-node/core

Benchmark	Current	Baseline	Change
plugins/async-node/core/src/__tests__/index.bench.ts > async node benchmarks > Resolve Async Node 1 times	13.32K ops/s	8.43K ops/s	+58.0% ✅
plugins/async-node/core/src/__tests__/index.bench.ts > async node benchmarks > Resolve Async Node 5 times	13.75K ops/s	7.76K ops/s	+77.2% ✅
plugins/async-node/core/src/__tests__/index.bench.ts > async node benchmarks > Resolve Async Node 10 times	9.60K ops/s	7.05K ops/s	+36.3% ✅
plugins/async-node/core/src/__tests__/index.bench.ts > async node benchmarks > Resolve Async Node 50 times	2.98K ops/s	2.12K ops/s	+41.1% ✅
plugins/async-node/core/src/__tests__/index.bench.ts > async node benchmarks > Resolve Async Node 100 times	1.62K ops/s	1.21K ops/s	+33.8% ✅
plugins/async-node/core/src/__tests__/transform.bench.ts > async transform benchmarks > Resolve Async Node 1 times	5.39K ops/s	4.53K ops/s	+19.1% ✅
plugins/async-node/core/src/__tests__/transform.bench.ts > async transform benchmarks > Resolve Async Node 5 times	6.52K ops/s	6.37K ops/s	+2.3%
plugins/async-node/core/src/__tests__/transform.bench.ts > async transform benchmarks > Resolve Async Node 10 times	5.55K ops/s	4.49K ops/s	+23.7% ✅
plugins/async-node/core/src/__tests__/transform.bench.ts > async transform benchmarks > Resolve Async Node 50 times	2.07K ops/s	1.81K ops/s	+13.9% ✅
plugins/async-node/core/src/__tests__/transform.bench.ts > async transform benchmarks > Resolve Async Node 100 times	1.55K ops/s	1.12K ops/s	+38.3% ✅

react/player

Benchmark	Current	Baseline	Change
react/player/src/asset/__tests__/index.bench.tsx > ReactAsset benchmarks > Render asset nested in 1 ReactAssets	602.84 ops/s	464.64 ops/s	+29.7% ✅
react/player/src/asset/__tests__/index.bench.tsx > ReactAsset benchmarks > Bubble errors nested in 1 ReactAssets	892.88 ops/s	744.86 ops/s	+19.9% ✅
react/player/src/asset/__tests__/index.bench.tsx > ReactAsset benchmarks > Render asset nested in 5 ReactAssets	564.73 ops/s	461.46 ops/s	+22.4% ✅
react/player/src/asset/__tests__/index.bench.tsx > ReactAsset benchmarks > Bubble errors nested in 5 ReactAssets	969.64 ops/s	679.18 ops/s	+42.8% ✅
react/player/src/asset/__tests__/index.bench.tsx > ReactAsset benchmarks > Render asset nested in 10 ReactAssets	618.00 ops/s	468.50 ops/s	+31.9% ✅
react/player/src/asset/__tests__/index.bench.tsx > ReactAsset benchmarks > Bubble errors nested in 10 ReactAssets	856.54 ops/s	563.74 ops/s	+51.9% ✅
react/player/src/asset/__tests__/index.bench.tsx > ReactAsset benchmarks > Render asset nested in 50 ReactAssets	498.41 ops/s	379.43 ops/s	+31.4% ✅
react/player/src/asset/__tests__/index.bench.tsx > ReactAsset benchmarks > Bubble errors nested in 50 ReactAssets	256.66 ops/s	190.07 ops/s	+35.0% ✅
react/player/src/asset/__tests__/index.bench.tsx > ReactAsset benchmarks > Render asset nested in 100 ReactAssets	358.28 ops/s	289.68 ops/s	+23.7% ✅
react/player/src/asset/__tests__/index.bench.tsx > ReactAsset benchmarks > Bubble errors nested in 100 ReactAssets	81.89 ops/s	80.66 ops/s	+1.5%

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (869f44c) to head (0e0d065).

Additional details and impacted files

@@       Coverage Diff        @@
##   a2ui-docs   #911   +/-   ##
================================
================================

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[brocollie08]

maybe make this an official enum

[KetanReddy]

IMO we shouldn't because we don't want to be prescriptive of what content formats we support on the ingestion side. We support A2UI and Player's internal format out of the box but if any consumer wants to add support for their own format we shouldn't have to explicitly support it.

[KVSRoyal]

Looks good from ios perspective

[sugarmanz]

I'm trying to understand why we should care about format type when loading mocks, I am seeing the start API cares about contentVersion? So, the idea is that whoever is loading content understands the shape of the content rather than testing for content spec within the adapter plugin itself?

[KetanReddy]

There was an issue where every mock that was getting loaded went through makeFlow which was causing issues with A2UI content. This was to allow that step to be skipped.

[sugarmanz]

Ah, fair enough — alternatively, can we just trigger makeFlow as a content transform the same way A2UI content is handled?

We can frame as a follow-up to unblock if necessary

[KetanReddy]

Yeah I think that would actually be a good follow up ticket. Might make sense to ship that as a default plugin for Player?