Skip to content

Replacement for some vcard tel type#624

Open
Terge3141 wants to merge 2 commits into
owncloud:masterfrom
Terge3141:master
Open

Replacement for some vcard tel type#624
Terge3141 wants to merge 2 commits into
owncloud:masterfrom
Terge3141:master

Conversation

@Terge3141

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The following 'tel' types are not shown correctly for a contact:
TYPE=VOICE;TYPE=CELL and TYPE=VOICE;TYPE=HOME
Both are shown as 'VOICE', on Android as Mobile and Home, respectively

Suggestion to change types:
TYPE=VOICE;TYPE=CELL --> CELL
TYPE=VOICE;TYPE=HOME --> HOME,VOICE

Example (sent by Android CardDAV-Sync free 0.4.201):
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:3.0
TEL;TYPE=VOICE;TYPE=HOME:41111
BDAY:2017-11-10
FN:CopyTest
TEL;TYPE=VOICE;TYPE=CELL:31111
UID:52e91035-f94a-4e5d-81cc-4d75bf07a0c7
N:;CopyTest;;;
PRODID:-//dmfs.org//mimedir.vcard//EN
REV:20171112T211147Z
END:VCARD

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jan 27, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #624 into master will decrease coverage by 0.23%.
The diff coverage is 0%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #624      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   18.72%   18.49%   -0.24%     
==========================================
  Files          51       51              
  Lines        1036     1049      +13     
==========================================
  Hits          194      194              
- Misses        842      855      +13
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
js/filters/vCard2JSON_filter.js 6.25% <0%> (-27.09%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8c6cb9c...41dc3d7. Read the comment docs.

@Julian1998 Julian1998 removed their assignment Dec 29, 2022

@dj4oC dj4oC left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • Security: not assessable without a fresh diff against current master (PR is from Nov 2017)
  • Stability: 9 years stale, predates the current CI/CLA/review tooling entirely.
  • Performance: n/a
  • Test coverage: unknown
  • TODOs found: 0 tracked
  • Dependency touched: no
  • CI status: none available

Verdict

Recommend closing as long-abandoned. If the underlying vCard TEL type issue is still valid, it should be re-filed against current code rather than resurrecting this branch.

🤖 Automated review by Claude Code (security · stability · performance · coverage)


Generated by Claude Code

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants