Skip to content

owners update#423

Open
iamkirkbater wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:masterfrom
iamkirkbater:owners-update
Open

owners update#423
iamkirkbater wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:masterfrom
iamkirkbater:owners-update

Conversation

@iamkirkbater

@iamkirkbater iamkirkbater commented Jun 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🖖🏼

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated project approvers list.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: c971282b-71c2-4970-bfa9-de12faa5186e

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c32c2ad and 74c0b63.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • OWNERS
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • OWNERS

Walkthrough

This pull request removes an approver entry from the OWNERS file. The iamkirkbater username is deleted from the approvers list, while other maintainers (ravitri and bmeng) remain in place.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
OWNERS file update
OWNERS
Removed iamkirkbater from the approvers list.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 14 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'owners update' is vague and generic, using non-descriptive language that doesn't convey the specific change (removal of an approver). Use a more specific title like 'Remove iamkirkbater from OWNERS approvers' to clearly indicate the actual change being made.
✅ Passed checks (14 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Stable And Deterministic Test Names ✅ Passed PR #423 only changes OWNERS (no test files/titles updated), so it doesn’t introduce any dynamic/unstable Ginkgo test names.
Test Structure And Quality ✅ Passed The PR commit (“owners update”) changes 277 files, and git show --name-only shows zero Go/Ginkgo test files (no .go, no _test.go), so there’s no Ginkgo test code to assess.
Microshift Test Compatibility ✅ Passed PR appears to only update root OWNERS (removing iamkirkbater); no new Ginkgo e2e tests are present, so MicroShift compatibility check is not applicable.
Single Node Openshift (Sno) Test Compatibility ✅ Passed PR changes only the OWNERS file, removing iamkirkbater; no new Ginkgo e2e tests or cluster-topology assumptions were added (git diff master..HEAD shows only OWNERS).
Topology-Aware Scheduling Compatibility ✅ Passed PR #423 modifies only OWNERS (1 deletion, no additions); no deployment manifests/operator/controller scheduling constraints were changed.
Ote Binary Stdout Contract ✅ Passed PR #423 only changes OWNERS (−1 line, 1 file changed); no process-level stdout code paths were modified, so the OTE stdout contract is unaffected.
Ipv6 And Disconnected Network Test Compatibility ✅ Passed PR #423 changes only OWNERS (1 deletion) and does not add/modify any Ginkgo e2e tests, so there are no IPv4/IPv6 or disconnected-network compatibility assumptions to flag.
No-Weak-Crypto ✅ Passed PR diff shows only an OWNERS change (removing iamkirkbater) and contains no MD5/SHA1/DES/RC4/3DES/Blowfish/ECB or crypto/comparison implementations.
Container-Privileges ✅ Passed PR #423 changes only the OWNERS file (removes iamkirkbater); no container/K8s manifests were modified, so no privileged/hostPID/hostNetwork/etc settings were introduced.
No-Sensitive-Data-In-Logs ✅ Passed PR #423 changes only the OWNERS file (removes approver iamkirkbater); no logging code or sensitive strings (passwords/tokens/PII/keys) were added.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from Makdaam and ravitri June 11, 2026 19:44
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: iamkirkbater
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign ahrabovs for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@iamkirkbater: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant