Skip to content

8376355: Update to use jtreg 8.2.1#598

Open
GoeLin wants to merge 1 commit into
openjdk:pr/593from
GoeLin:goetz_backport_8376355
Open

8376355: Update to use jtreg 8.2.1#598
GoeLin wants to merge 1 commit into
openjdk:pr/593from
GoeLin:goetz_backport_8376355

Conversation

@GoeLin

@GoeLin GoeLin commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8376355 needs maintainer approval

Integration blocker

 ⚠️ Dependency #593 must be integrated first

Issue

  • JDK-8376355: Update to use jtreg 8.2.1 (Enhancement - P3)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/598/head:pull/598
$ git checkout pull/598

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/598
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/598/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 598

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 598

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/598.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper

bridgekeeper Bot commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Welcome back goetz! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into pr/593 will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk

openjdk Bot commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@openjdk openjdk Bot changed the title backport 1e99cc4880f695c12705d849d41609f176f897bd 8376355: Update to use jtreg 8.2.1 Jun 8, 2026
@openjdk

openjdk Bot commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk Bot added backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jun 8, 2026
@mlbridge

mlbridge Bot commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Webrevs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required rfr Pull request is ready for review

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant