Update README.md with minimal ethics

[wieker]

Inference of minimal ethics from the MDL principle

[wieker]

https://transitional-writes.dreamwidth.org/44972.html?thread=133036#cmt133036
https://web.archive.org/web/20260611035039/https://transitional-writes.dreamwidth.org/44972.html

1. Just take a simple worm.
2. It has a very simple neural net, that emits and recieve very low frequency radio waves.
3. Highly likely it may be useful to use short impulses, like in the PSU.
4. To send and receive even very low frequency waves you can use very short antennas if impedance is matched.
5. The modern beam forming is possible with the sub-mm accuracy, and with high speed sampling rate you can sample neurons group by group.
   The next step depends on what is the real algorithmic complexity of the human brain and behavior is.
   But to estimate it you can just take a look at the IPCAMERAS, and get that it is very small.
   And the real algorithmic complexity of human brain is relatively low.
   It seems the minimum description length principle could be used to deduce minimum ethics. At least you can compare ethics by the length. What about the following question: how to shoot met-art girl in the dark underground? ~2026-24709-41 (talk) 16:43, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Solomonoff%27s_theory_of_inductive_inference

you can ask machine learning people about the next step of how hard is to recognize human brain processes from the radio wave dumps.
the answer may surprise you ppl
ask OpenCV or other signal processing ppl with the lean to the most general algorithms like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Solomonoff%27s_theory_of_inductive_inference

the answer is surprising you, contact GPS experts ppl
Contact GPS experts and machine learning people.
The most closest RF point are GPS experts with beamforming and large antenna arrays experties.
beamforming is a technic to use several antennas to receive or transmit signals in a very precise direction. it is used in the LTE base stations and Starlink
you can reproduce it with KiwiSDR or HackRF
there were some merged pull request to HackRF on this topic
also the timestamp Verilog code that intersect GPS signal path and HF signal path in KiwiSDR is related to the beamforming techniq

even if you think it is a joke or is in doubt about some points - send it as is to other radio and machine learning engineers pls
but if you are in doubt - just ask some questions about point that is confusing you

[wieker]

https://transitional-writes.dreamwidth.org/52172.html

Basically the idea is that exist program that render picture that you see
in the front of you.
There is a sequence of programs that render every frame that you see in the front of you.
This is the formal spec for a program for memoirs of every software engineer.

Are you software engineer or not?
That could be the beginning of the lectures on algorithm theory and inductive logic.
Is it right?

Something strange.
Is there difference between russian and english?

Let's try to describe it in english.
Maybe it can help in understanding.

1. There is a set of all procedures (algorithms) that generates all possible
   frame streams from IP cameras.
   That could be C programs, OpenGL shaders or POVRay scripts for example.
   Self extracting ZIP files and H264 encoded movies with attached decoder are
   also useful.

2. Each movie has its own backstage. That IP camera is attached (maybe virtually) to one person.
   There are 7 999 999 999 other persons on Earth. You don't see their records.

3. What you really see (your IP camera see) acts as xdelta utility.
   Movies that are rejected frame by frame by this xdelta application are
   removed from the infinite set.
   The real set that is operated by human is really simple and maybe finite of course.

4. Then shorter that procedure that generates video stream - then more probable this scenario is.

Looks like english version is shorter and more procedural.
It looks more like a program that I describe.
Maybe it is an ancestry from latin language?

Maybe it's just a game but it is very simple game.

1. There is an infinite set of all procedures that generates all IPcam movies.

2. There is an xdelta procedure that cut all movies that don't appear on IPcam
   that is attached to you.

3. There are other 7 999 999 999 persons on Earth.

4. Then shorter is the procedure in the infinite set then more probable associated movie is.

That's it.

1. There is an infinite set of all procedures that generates all IPcam movies.

but all that procedures are not black boxes in general.
we can extract some subprocedures.
physics for example.

but what are the other elementary subprocedures?

procedural hypno?
how to generate it?
is it the basis of modern LLMs?

[wieker]

Elementary mathematics for future school teachers.

Let's review the following ideas.

We can assume that there is a digital photo that displays exactly the same scene at the same
time that you see with one of your eyes. (Let's assume that the second eye you lose
during the punishment after critical security issue were detected in your code)

There are a lot of possible programs that paint that digital photo exactly byte to byte,
bit to bit.
Some of them are large. Some of them are shorter.
We can assume that during your life you see a sequence of such frames (scenes). And each one
could be rendered by some programs.
This is the formal spec for a program for memoirs of every software engineer.

But this memoirs can be generated even for persons that are not software engineers.
And, of course, all possible fake memoirs could be generated in all possible ways for every
person on the Earth.

The set containing programs to generate all possible fake and real memoirs of all humans that are alive on Earth is the so called Solomonoff a-priory distribution (but Ancient Egypt and Greeks know about it also).
You know what memoir is real if you are talking about yourself.
How to check what is the real memoir of other persons?
There is simple way to do that.
The probability that this memoir is real is reverse proportional to the logarithm of its length.
Hmm. We need logarithm in the schools also.

So the most simple memoirs are most probable.

Also, trust only software that you wrote by yourself.
Because the most probable scenario that software that you get from other person
was written by monkeys. Idiotic monkeys.
That is the shocking reality.

The same is right about relay logic.
Use only relay logic.

The GNU FTP mirror is maintained by a few people with autism syndrome.
The Java maven repository is abandonware with a lot of dependencies that
are downloaded by almost infinite chains and could be compromised in a
lot of ways.
The Google Gemini AI personal information is hosted on GitHub.

And all that staff is used in the systems that operate trillions of dollars.
Stop to do that ppl.

Use relay logic, transistors, small discrete logic like 74HC04.

Also a lot of monkeys don't understand how to use money in a proper way.
But those who understand know that it is the only mean to communicate between
monkeys. Monkeys who don't understand money can not communicate at all.
That's so called Mises calculation argument.

It seems the minimum description length principle could be used to deduce minimum ethics. At least you can compare ethics by the length. What about the following question: how to shoot met-art girl in the dark underground?
at least we can ask a question: does russian met-art model from a pic want some money?
and what obstacles do that guess so hard?
why it is so hard to contact her directly?
she lose money, interesting person lose opportunity to make some photos.

Also the only way to obtain physical safety in the world where monkeys write
software is to have personal arsenals of assault rifles, grenades and quadcopters.

Also, don't trust literature. When someone trust without full proof by himself then
it results that criminal is heading to the authors. And add shit to the books.
Each school teacher has to write his own version and check all the proofs.
Each school teacher has to write his own version with all the proofs verified by himself.

So first tell ppl elementary mathematics and Solomonoff distribution. That tells
that every shit can happen. Because there are only monkeys around you.
Don't trust monkeys. That leads that criminal is starting to replace them.

And learn your students to check all proofs.
Also, if there are any questions about who send you that:

Kirill Abramovich
Samara, Russia

That's it.