[Tools] Manual Validation - Enumeration update (take 2)#396900
Merged
Conversation
Added JSON file, containing enumeration data. Along with extensive fixes and updates.
6/24 sanity check-in.
Madhusudhan-MSFT
approved these changes
Jul 13, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📖 Description
Adds numerous security, safety, and QOL enhancements, to streamline and modernize the Manual Validation workflow.
✅ Checklist
🤖 Details of files and changes:
Should be migrated into
ManualValidationPipeline.jsonand depreciated.MMCExceptionList.txt
Large data file
Autowaiver.csv
ExitCodes.csv
ManualValidationPipeline.csv
ManualValidationPipeline.json
Schema file for misc items
ManualValidationSchema.json
VM $profile
ManualValidationProfile.ps1
C# and PS versions of app. (C# port is severely behind PS mainline)
ManualValidationPipeline.cs
ManualValidationPipeline.ps1
These are probably unnecessary - created when I was confused about the new token limitation.
Microsoft Reviewers: Open in CodeFlow