Skip to content

Update bytes to 0.6.#51

Open
najamelan wants to merge 1 commit into
matthunz:masterfrom
najamelan:update_deps
Open

Update bytes to 0.6.#51
najamelan wants to merge 1 commit into
matthunz:masterfrom
najamelan:update_deps

Conversation

@najamelan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This allows dependent crates to use the latest version of bytes.

@mxinden

mxinden commented Nov 4, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@matthunz friendly ping. What do you think of bumping bytes?

@mxinden

mxinden commented Nov 17, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I will try once more. @matthunz would you mind taking a look at this pull request? This is blocking all downstream crates to update. Please let me know in case I can be of any help.

@pimeys

pimeys commented Jan 4, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This should now go to bytes 1.0, and it would be great if we'd get a new version soon. :)

@Keruspe

Keruspe commented Jan 5, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@matthunz do you need help for getting a released with bytes 1.0?

@mxinden

mxinden commented Jan 14, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

futures-codec not updating to bytes v1.0 blocked many downstream crates e.g. rust-libp2p to upgrade other dependencies. I decided to fork futures-codec to provide a fully upgraded version: https://github.com/mxinden/asynchronous-codec

For now asynchronous-codec is a 1-to-1 fork of futures-codec, differing only in its dependency versions. In the future I plan to incorporate improvements like #54 while keeping dependencies up to date via Dependabot.

@matthunz I am happy to collaborate on merging the two projects (futures-codec and asynchronous-codec) again. This likely goes without saying: I forked futures-codec out of necessity, not out of bad faith. I preserved the git history and license. In addition you are mentioned as the original author in the readme. Thanks for open sourcing futures-codec.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants