Hi @lgmgeo ,
First, tahnks for the great tool.
I am using the version 3.5.10.
I am starting testing it on Dragen outcomes and I have few doubts still unresolved. My test case is made of Inversions and Translocations (a mix of benign and pathogenic), which are represented as follows:
chr2 38121110 DRAGEN:BND:126718:0:1:0:0:0:0 C G]chr2:47669522] 999 PASS SVTYPE=BND;MATEID=DRAGEN:BND:126718:0:1:0:0:0:1 GT:GQ:PL:PR:SR:SB:FS:VF 0/1:999:999,0,999:64,29:48,16:24,24,0,16:37.390:88,45
chr2 38121111 DRAGEN:BND:126718:0:1:1:0:0:0 T [chr2:47669523[T 999 PASS SVTYPE=BND;MATEID=DRAGEN:BND:126718:0:1:1:0:0:1 GT:GQ:PL:PR:SR:SB:FS:VF 0/1:999:999,0,999:65,25:48,19:24,24,18,1:32.535:88,43
chr2 47669521 DRAGEN:BND:126718:0:1:0:0:0:1 C T]chr2:38121111] 999 PASS SVTYPE=BND;MATEID=DRAGEN:BND:126718:0:1:0:0:0:0 GT:GQ:PL:PR:SR:SB:FS:VF 0/1:999:999,0,999:64,29:48,16:24,24,0,16:37.390:88,45
chr2 47669522 DRAGEN:BND:126718:0:1:1:0:0:1 A [chr2:38121112[A 999 PASS SVTYPE=BND;MATEID=DRAGEN:BND:126718:0:1:1:0:0:0 GT:GQ:PL:PR:SR:SB:FS:VF 0/1:999:999,0,999:65,25:48,19:24,24,18,1:32.535:88,43
- small inversion (contained in reads)
chr4 144359319 DRAGEN:INV:1:0:0:0 TTGACTCCAGCCTTTATAACCTGCCCAGGAGTTATTCCCATGATGTTTTACCAAAGGTGTCTCCATCAAGT <INV> 82 PASS END=144359389;SVTYPE=INV;SVLEN=-70;CIGAR=1M70I70D;CONTIG=TACTTGATGGAGACACCTTTGGTAAAACATCATGGGAATAACTCCTGGGCAGGTTATAAAGGCTGGAGTCACA;CIPOS=0,2;HOMLEN=2;HOMSEQ=TG; GT:FT:GQ:PL:PR:SR:SB:FS:VF 0/1:PASS:82:132,0,999:48,0:130,12:50,80,11,1:0.000:131,12
chr7 152402130 DRAGEN:BND:TOY002:0:0:0:0:0:0 C C[chr21:10415010[ 999 PASS SVTYPE=BND;MATEID=DRAGEN:BND:TOY002:0:0:0:0:0:1;EVENT=DRAGEN:BND:TOY002:0:0:0:0:0:0;BND_DEPTH=88;MATE_BND_DEPTH=91 GT:FT:GQ:PL:PR:SR 1/1:PASS:99:999,999,0:0,63:0,58
chr7 152402134 DRAGEN:BND:TOY002:1:0:0:0:0:0 A A[chr21:10415016[ 999 PASS SVTYPE=BND;MATEID=DRAGEN:BND:TOY002:1:0:0:0:0:1;EVENT=DRAGEN:BND:TOY002:0:0:0:0:0:0;BND_DEPTH=85;MATE_BND_DEPTH=89 GT:FT:GQ:PL:PR:SR 1/1:PASS:99:999,999,0:0,60:0,55
chr21 10415010 DRAGEN:BND:TOY002:0:0:0:0:0:1 C ]chr7:152402130]C 999 PASS SVTYPE=BND;MATEID=DRAGEN:BND:TOY002:0:0:0:0:0:0;EVENT=DRAGEN:BND:TOY002:0:0:0:0:0:0;BND_DEPTH=91;MATE_BND_DEPTH=88 GT:FT:GQ:PL:PR:SR 1/1:PASS:99:999,999,0:0,58:0,63
chr21 10415016 DRAGEN:BND:TOY002:1:0:0:0:0:1 G ]chr7:152402134]G 999 PASS SVTYPE=BND;MATEID=DRAGEN:BND:TOY002:1:0:0:0:0:0;EVENT=DRAGEN:BND:TOY002:0:0:0:0:0:0;BND_DEPTH=89;MATE_BND_DEPTH=85 GT:FT:GQ:PL:PR:SR 1/1:PASS:99:999,999,0:0,55:0,60
My questions are:
- will these BNDs be recognised as single events? If now, how can I reach a "single-event" annotation?
- can I build a custom resource with selected clinvar and gnomad translocations and inversions records? How should this resource be?
- how is the match to a custom resource managed? Can I control the overlap? Do you have any suggestion?
Thank you!
Valentina
Hi @lgmgeo ,
First, tahnks for the great tool.
I am using the version 3.5.10.
I am starting testing it on Dragen outcomes and I have few doubts still unresolved. My test case is made of Inversions and Translocations (a mix of benign and pathogenic), which are represented as follows:
My questions are:
Thank you!
Valentina