docs: fix README License section to reflect shipped Apache-2.0#1
Merged
Conversation
Mirrors kiloloop/iantha-dev#6 (39865e0). v0.1.0 README claimed 'MIT (TBD)' — placeholder text from before the Apache-2.0 LICENSE shipped. The two now agree. v0.1.0 tag stays as-is (re-tagging a released version is bad practice for a doc-only change). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <[email protected]>
spbkgw-beep
approved these changes
May 1, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Mirror of kiloloop/iantha-dev#6 (commit
39865e0).The v0.1.0 README claimed
License: MIT (TBD — license file to be added before public release)— leftover placeholder text from before the OSS scaffolding PR. The shipped LICENSE file is Apache-2.0, so the two contradict.Diff
Notes
v0.1.0tag stays at commit92d0cb6— re-tagging an already-released version for a one-line README fix is bad practice. The README atmainwill be correct; the v0.1.0 release artifact retains the original (pre-fix) README.🤖 Generated with Claude Code