Skip to content

bms TUI page, database size tracking / state table purging, automated exporting#82

Open
AndrewCarlisleECE wants to merge 37 commits into
mainfrom
dev/philip_nuke
Open

bms TUI page, database size tracking / state table purging, automated exporting#82
AndrewCarlisleECE wants to merge 37 commits into
mainfrom
dev/philip_nuke

Conversation

@AndrewCarlisleECE

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Dec 9, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

📦 Dependency Check 📦

Did you add a new dependency? If so, justify why it must be added. Dependencies adding functionality that could reasonably be written by the YJSP team should be rejected, as well as those that are not actively maintained.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Dec 9, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🚀 Verification Evidence 🚀

How do you know that your changes work? Reply to this comment with with specific evidence that all functionality added or changed in this pull request is working as expected.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Dec 9, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🧪 Regression Testing 🧪

What have you done to ensure that future regressions of the functionality added or changed in this pull request are caught before being deployed to a production environment? This can include unit, isolation, and/or integration tests, or manual procedures if necessary.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Dec 9, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

📝 Documentation 📝

Where is this work being tracked, and is the ticket describing these changes up to date? Reply with a link to the ticket and all other documentation such as RFCs and PDRs. The reviewer(s) must also confirm that all documentation is up to date.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Dec 9, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🚀 Verification Evidence 🚀

How do you know that your changes work? Reply to this comment with with specific evidence that all functionality added or changed in this pull request is working as expected.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Dec 9, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🧪 Regression Testing 🧪

What have you done to ensure that future regressions of the functionality added or changed in this pull request are caught before being deployed to a production environment? This can include unit, isolation, and/or integration tests, or manual procedures if necessary.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Dec 9, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

📝 Documentation 📝

Where is this work being tracked, and is the ticket describing these changes up to date? Reply with a link to the ticket and all other documentation such as RFCs and PDRs. The reviewer(s) must also confirm that all documentation is up to date.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Dec 9, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

📦 Dependency Check 📦

Did you add a new dependency? If so, justify why it must be added. Dependencies adding functionality that could reasonably be written by the YJSP team should be rejected, as well as those that are not actively maintained.

@namebobb
namebobb requested a review from acr12856 March 25, 2026 22:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants