This work builds upon Geometric Insights into the Goldbach Conjecture.
Author: Frank Vega
Institution: Information Physics Institute, Hialeah, FL, USA
Keywords: Goldbach conjecture, geometric construction, semiprimes, pigeonhole principle
The Goldbach conjecture states that every even integer greater than 2 is the sum of two primes. We present a computational approach that provides strong evidence for a variant: every even integer
Our key insight is a geometric equivalence: this is true if and only if for every
Through computational analysis up to
The Goldbach conjecture is one of mathematics' oldest unsolved problems: can every even integer greater than 2 be expressed as the sum of two primes?
We study a variant that excludes identical primes:
Variant: Every even integer
$\geq 8$ is the sum of two distinct primes.
This excludes
We provide strong computational and theoretical evidence for this variant by connecting it to a surprising geometric property of nested squares.
Start with a square
Let
-
$P + Q = 2N$ (an even number) -
$P \cdot Q = N^2 - M^2$ (the L-shaped area) - Both
$P$ and$Q$ must be odd (same parity)
The Goldbach variant is true
When this happens, the L-shaped area is a semiprime (product of exactly two primes).
Figure 1: The L-shaped region between nested squares. For N=5, M=2: P=3 and Q=7 (both prime), giving area 21 = 3×7 and sum 3+7=10.
For any even number
Geometrically, this is equivalent to finding an
-
$P = N - M$ is prime -
$Q = N + M$ is prime - The L-shaped area
$P \cdot Q$ is a semiprime
This transforms an arithmetic problem into a geometric search.
For each
Question: How many valid
We define a "gap function":
This measures how many "bad"
We computed
Table 1: Minimum Gap Values Across Power-of-Two Intervals
| Interval | Range | Min at |
Min |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 5 | 4.30 | |
| 3 | 9 | 7.36 | |
| 4 | 19 | 10.24 | |
| 5 | 61 | 14.08 | |
| 6 | 73 | 17.84 | |
| 7 | 151 | 20.61 | |
| 8 | 269 | 23.54 | |
| 9 | 541 | 28.81 | |
| 10 | 1327 | 33.15 | |
| 11 | 2161 | 35.08 | |
| 12 | 7069 | 42.33 | |
| 13 | 14138 | 44.06 |
Key Observation:
Claim: Our computational evidence strongly suggests that every even integer
The computational data shows that
In other words, the number of "bad"
Now, for each prime
Pigeonhole Principle: If we have more candidates than bad values, at least one candidate must be good!
For
For
Therefore: candidates > bad values
For
-
$N=4$ ($2N=8$ ):$C_4 = \{1\}$ (from$P=3$ ).$D_4 = \{1\}$ (from pair$(3,5) $ ). Intersection:$\{1\}$ . Partition:$8 = 3+5$ . ✓ -
$N=5$ ($2N=10$ ):$C_5 = \{2\}$ (from$P=3$ ).$D_5 = \{2\}$ (from$(3,7) $ ). Intersection:$\{2\}$ . Partition:$10 = 3+7$ . ✓ -
$N=6$ ($2N=12$ ):$C_6 = \{3,1\}$ (from$P \in \{3,5\}$ ).$D_6 = \{1,2,3\}$ ($M=4$ excluded as$>3$ ). Intersection:$\{1,3\}$ . Partition:$12 = 5+7$ . ✓ -
$N=7$ ($2N=14$ ):$C_7 = \{4,2\}$ .$D_7 = \{3,4\}$ ($M=5$ excluded as$>4$ ). Intersection:$\{4\}$ . Partition:$14 = 3+11$ . ✓ -
$N=8$ ($2N=16$ ):$C_8 = \{5,3,1\}$ .$D_8 = \{2,3,4,5\}$ . Intersection:$\{3,5\}$ . Partition:$16 = 3+13$ . ✓ -
$N=9$ ($2N=18$ ):$C_9 = \{6,4,2\}$ .$D_9 = \{2,4\}$ . Intersection:$\{2,4\}$ . Partition:$18 = 5+13$ . ✓ -
$N=10$ ($2N=20$ ):$C_{10} = \{7,5,3\}$ .$D_{10} = \{3,7\}$ . Intersection:$\{3,7\}$ . Partition:$20 = 3+17$ . ✓ -
$N=11$ ($2N=22$ ):$C_{11} = \{8,6,4\}$ .$D_{11} = \{6,8\}$ . Intersection:$\{6,8\}$ . Partition:$22 = 3+19$ . ✓ -
$N=12$ ($2N=24$ ):$C_{12} = \{9,7,5,1\}$ .$D_{12} = \{1,5,7\}$ . Intersection:$\{1,5,7\}$ . Partition:$24 = 5+19$ . ✓
For
We have demonstrated through computational and theoretical analysis that every even integer
- Establishing a geometric equivalence with nested squares and semiprimes
-
Computing empirical bounds on the number of valid configurations up to
$N = 2^{14}$ -
Applying the pigeonhole principle to provide strong theoretical evidence that at least one solution exists for all
$N$
This demonstrates how geometric thinking and computational data can combine with classical combinatorial principles to provide compelling evidence for number-theoretic claims.
The computational verification is available in this repository. Run python experiment.py to reproduce the results in Table 1.
Requirements: Python 3.12+, gmpy2 library
Available as PDF at Geometric Insights into the Goldbach Conjecture.
