Skip to content

Add a logo property - #68

Open
linkmauve wants to merge 1 commit into
ewilderj:masterfrom
linkmauve:add-logo
Open

Add a logo property#68
linkmauve wants to merge 1 commit into
ewilderj:masterfrom
linkmauve:add-logo

Conversation

@linkmauve

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fixes #40.

kjetilk
kjetilk previously approved these changes Jul 30, 2019

@kjetilk kjetilk left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me!

Now, we need a process to get it into the namespace document.

@linkmauve

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

You mean take this change once it is merged and publish it at http://usefulinc.com/ns/doap#?

@kjetilk

kjetilk commented Jul 30, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

You mean take this change once it is merged and publish it at http://usefulinc.com/ns/doap#?

Yeah, currently, we don't have any automated means for that, so it depends on @ewilderj 's time.

@linkmauve

linkmauve commented Sep 7, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Hi @ewilderj, any news on that?

@ewilderj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

I like the notion of this -- can you speak to the range of Container? I think the most expected thing would be for someone to reference an image file, or a list of image files. This PR would be best if it also incorporated an amended example to show usage?

@ewilderj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

I'm wondering about pursuing this in the same category as the #50 screenshot property. I don't think the range of sioc:Container is appropriate, given my reading of http://rdfs.org/sioc/spec/#term_Container -- however no objection to the property name, so it makes sense. I think we can usefully use terms from https://github.com/facebookarchive/open-graph-protocol/blob/master/ns/ogp.me.rdf

@ewilderj
ewilderj dismissed kjetilk’s stale review June 10, 2024 23:52

Unapproving so we can have the discussion about the range

@ewilderj ewilderj self-assigned this Jun 10, 2024
@kjetilk

kjetilk commented Jun 11, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Yes, sioc:Container may not be appropriate. There's foaf:Image, of course.

@Claudenw

Claudenw commented Feb 9, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

In practice many of the Apache projects have multiple logo files representing different sizes and formats. Would this link then work by the container then having multiple arbitrary image objects within the container?

@kjetilk

kjetilk commented Feb 11, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Perhaps the best thing would be to have a range of a thing that may have properties of sizes and formats? https://schema.org/ImageObject , perhaps?`

So that you would simply have multiple doap:logo properties for different versions?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add a logo property

4 participants