Skip to content

Update c8 10.1.3 → 12.0.0 (major) - #330

Open
depfu[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
depfu/update/npm/c8-12.0.0
Open

Update c8 10.1.3 → 12.0.0 (major)#330
depfu[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
depfu/update/npm/c8-12.0.0

Conversation

@depfu

@depfu depfu Bot commented Jul 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Here is everything you need to know about this upgrade. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.

What changed?

✳️ c8 (10.1.3 → 12.0.0) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

12.0.0

12.0.0 (2026-07-14)

⚠ BREAKING CHANGES

  • yargs enforces a stricter range of Node versions ^20.19.0 || ^22.12.0 || >=23

Features

11.0.0

11.0.0 (2026-02-22)

⚠ BREAKING CHANGES

  • deps: transitive deps require 20 || >=22

Bug Fixes

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 7 commits:

↗️ @​istanbuljs/schema (indirect, 0.1.3 → 0.1.6) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

0.1.6

0.1.6 (2026-04-13)

Bug Fixes

  • Undo change to schema in 0.1.x series (440f977)

0.1.5

0.1.5 (2026-04-13)

Bug Fixes

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 7 commits:

↗️ minipass (indirect, 7.1.2 → 7.1.3) · Repo · Changelog

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 3 commits:

↗️ test-exclude (indirect, 7.0.1 → 8.0.0) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

8.0.0 (from changelog)

⚠ BREAKING CHANGES

  • deps: now requires node 20 due to transitive dependencies

Bug Fixes

  • deps: upgrade to latest version of glob (#72) (2b914c8)

7.0.2 (from changelog)

Bug Fixes

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

🆕 balanced-match (added, 4.0.4)

🆕 brace-expansion (added, 5.0.8)

🆕 cliui (added, 9.0.1)

🆕 wrap-ansi (added, 9.0.2)

🆕 glob (added, 13.0.6)

🆕 lru-cache (added, 11.5.2)

🆕 minimatch (added, 10.2.5)

🆕 path-scurry (added, 2.0.2)

🆕 yargs (added, 18.0.0)

🆕 yargs-parser (added, 22.0.0)


Depfu Status

Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with @depfu rebase.

All Depfu comment commands
@​depfu rebase
Rebases against your default branch and redoes this update
@​depfu recreate
Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits that you've made to it
@​depfu merge
Merges this PR once your tests are passing and conflicts are resolved
@​depfu cancel merge
Cancels automatic merging of this PR
@​depfu close
Closes this PR and deletes the branch
@​depfu reopen
Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if it's closed)
@​depfu pause
Ignores all future updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu pause [minor|major]
Ignores all future minor/major updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu resume
Future versions of this dependency will create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)

@depfu depfu Bot added the depfu label Jul 23, 2026
@codeant-ai

codeant-ai Bot commented Jul 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Skipping PR review because a bot author is detected.

If you want to trigger CodeAnt AI, comment @codeant-ai review to trigger a manual review.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (eca59bd) to head (26876f7).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #330   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            2         2           
  Lines          470       470           
=========================================
  Hits           470       470           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@llamapreview llamapreview Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AI Code Review by LlamaPReview

🎯 TL;DR & Recommendation

Recommendation: Approve with suggestions

This PR upgrades c8 from v10.1.3 to v12.0.0, bringing breaking changes in Node engine requirements and a security fix (CVE-2026-26996). All CI checks pass, but the project lacks an explicit engines field to guard against incompatible Node versions.

🌟 Strengths

  • All security and quality scans passed.
  • Upgrade includes a fix for CVE-2026-26996.

💡 Suggestions (P2)

  • package.json: The new c8 requires Node ^20.19.0 || ^22.12.0 || >=23, but the project does not declare an engines field. This could cause silent failures for developers using older Node versions. Consider adding the engines constraint to make the requirement explicit.

💡 Have feedback? We'd love to hear it in our GitHub Discussions.
✨ This review was generated by LlamaPReview Advanced, which is free for all open-source projects. Learn more.

Comment thread package.json
Comment on lines 84 to 87
"devDependencies": {
"ava": "^6.3.0",
"c8": "^10.1.3"
"c8": "^12.0.0"
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 | Confidence: Medium

Speculative: The upgrade from c8 v10 to v12 jumps two major versions (10.1.3 → 12.0.0) carrying breaking changes that enforce stricter Node.js engine requirements: ^20.19.0 || ^22.12.0 || >=23. The project's package.json does not include an engines field to enforce this constraint. While the CI tests passed in this PR (suggesting the CI environment already satisfies the requirement), any developer or CI runner using Node <20.19.0 would encounter runtime failures when c8 is invoked (e.g., c8 ava). Without an explicit engines guard, the upgrade introduces a silent compatibility risk for local development or non‑updated CI runners. The positive side is that v11 already addressed CVE‑2026‑26996 (minimatch), so the upgrade also brings a security fix. Adding an engines field would make the constraint explicit and prevent accidental usage on incompatible Node versions.

Code Suggestion:

"engines": {
    "node": "^20.19.0 || ^22.12.0 || >=23"
  },
  "devDependencies": {
    "ava": "^6.3.0",
    "c8": "^12.0.0"
  }

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants