TWI Charter: Updated definitions of Provenance#316
Closed
mbronk-intc wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
mbronk-intc
requested review from
AlecFernandez,
CookieComputing,
cxzhang,
dcmiddle,
fritzalder,
hannibalhuang,
mssun,
npmccallum and
yashkmankad
as code owners
mbronk-intc
added a commit
to confidential-computing/twi
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 16, 2025
Moved proposal from confidential-computing/governance#316
Author
|
Moved to: |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #314
This is a follow-on to:
which originally targeted WIMSE I-D, but has been repurposed to move into TWI Reference Architecture. As a consequence, the supporting definitions update belongs here (for term consistency).