feat(app): add 'app create' command (page-money default) - #6
Merged
Conversation
`civitai app create` is a friendly, batteries-included scaffolder — a thin superset of `app init` that defaults --template to the rich `page-money` SDK template (vs init's no-build `static` default). All other flags (--dir/--name/--template/--from) behave identically. Both commands now share a single `runAppScaffold` helper (extracted from app_init.go) covering slug/display derivation, dir resolution, rendering, self-validation, and harness-aware next-steps output — no logic fork. `init` is kept registered + behaviorally unchanged (back-compat alias); `create` is the documented happy path (app group examples + README). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
ZacxDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 5, 2026
…im that was measured wrong (#204) The canonical handoff doc on `main` had gone stale in the way that costs the next session real time: it still listed shipped work as pending, and carried one confident claim that measurement disproved. 🔴 THE DEDUP ADVICE WAS WRONG AND WOULD HAVE SHIPPED A BROKEN METRIC. The doc said \"per-mount, so unique views need query-side dedup\". `blockInstanceId` is NOT per-mount — it is `page_apb_<ULID>`, roughly one per PLACEMENT. Measured on prod: 124 rows carried 28 distinct `blockInstanceId` across 27 distinct `appBlockId`, ~1:1 with the app, so deduping on it reports ~1 unique viewer per app. Corrected in place, with the measurement, because the wrong version was specific and plausible enough to be followed. Brought current: - Follow-ups #6 and #5 marked DONE (civitai#3613 + cli#195, civitai#3626), plus cli#193/#194 and civitai#3627. The DONE table goes 8 -> 15 PRs. - `preview / component-tests` is no longer an open question: it reported success on #3606 and every subsequent PR (1259/1259), verified by reading the locator at each PR's head SHA rather than inferring from timing. - Deploy/verify status now records that the feature was verified IN PRODUCTION, not merely deployed — with the caveat that 20ms against ~125 rows in one partition proves the query is correct today, not that partition pruning holds at scale. - Records how to actually READ the preview component log (it lives in the Tekton taskrun, not behind the GitHub status URL), and that the taskrun reports Succeeded even when the suite fails because the step is report-only. - The pins rot recurred within a day exactly as predicted — cli#203 re-bumped both pins on 2026-08-05 — so that is now documented as a standing property of the repo, not an incident to diagnose a third time. - Adds the marketplace search-debounce flake (338ms measured against its own 300ms budget) as a latent issue for whoever owns that test. A security finding from this stream was reported privately per SECURITY.md. The mechanism is deliberately NOT in this doc — only the operational consequence, and a pointer to ask security before changing the ingest path. Docs-only; `make ci` green and `gofmt -s -l .` prints nothing. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017vvMdxcMKJP9ripQLEiPm9 Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
Adds
civitai app create [name] [dir]— a friendly, batteries-included scaffolder that is a thin superset ofapp init, defaulting to the richpage-moneySDK template instead of init's no-buildstaticdefault.page-moneyis a Vite + React + TypeScript full-page (W10) money-path block wired to the published App SDK (estimate → consent → submit → poll → Buzz spend), with a mock-host dev harness and a unit test.create <name>gives you a project that is immediatelynpm install && npm run dev:harness-runnable, test-green, andcivitai app validate-clean out of the box.How
app_init.gointorunAppScaffold(...)(plus aprintScaffoldResultoutput helper). Bothinitandcreatecall it — slug/display derivation, positional/--dirresolution + conflict check, render, self-validation viavalidate.Dir, refuse-non-empty-dir, and harness-aware next-steps all live in one place.createdefaults--templatetopage-money;initkeeps itsstaticdefault. Every other flag (--dir,--name,-t/--template,--from) behaves identically;--from's "not yet wired" error is preserved on both.initstays registered and behaviorally unchanged (back-compat alias).createis the documented happy path:appgroup examples + README updated (quickstart + command-reference table).Tests
internal/cmd/app_create_cmd_test.go:createdefaults to page-money (correct files + budgeted-scope manifest +dev:harnessnext-step),--templateoverride works, slug derivation from a free-form display name, refuse-non-empty-dir,--fromerrors.initstill defaults tostatic, andinit --template page-moneystill works (proves the shared-helper refactor didn't change init).go build ./...,go vet ./...,go test ./...all green (43 cmd tests, 16 scaffold tests pass).Out of scope (Phase 2)
Per the task, this does not modify the template's test files or wire in the SDK
createMockHost— that's a deliberate follow-up gated on the SDK publish (@civitai/blocks-reactPR #50). This PR is just thecreatecommand + the shared-helper refactor; templates were left untouched.🤖 Generated with Claude Code