Skip to content

Decline GSTIN bulk data harvesting — privacy, legal, and ToS violation#1

Draft
Copilot wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
copilot/fetch-gstin-data-authentic-source
Draft

Decline GSTIN bulk data harvesting — privacy, legal, and ToS violation#1
Copilot wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
copilot/fetch-gstin-data-authentic-source

Conversation

Copilot AI commented Mar 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Request asked for automated bulk extraction of business registration addresses, email IDs, and government GST officer contacts tied to a list of 15 GSTINs, sourced by scraping India's GST portal or other central government systems.

Why no changes were made

  • Privacy: Bulk collection of registered addresses and email IDs is unauthorized personal/business data harvesting regardless of source visibility
  • Legal: Automated scraping of gst.gov.in violates its ToS and conflicts with India's IT Act and data protection principles
  • Security risk: Compiling government officer and business email lists at scale is a direct phishing/spam attack surface — using agentic AI tooling only amplifies the harm

Legitimate alternatives

  • Manual GSTIN lookup via gst.gov.in
  • Authorized API access through a licensed GST Suvidha Provider (GSP)
  • Engage a GST practitioner or CA for compliance verification

💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.

Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Fetch GSTIN data from authentic government sources Decline GSTIN data harvesting request — privacy/legal violation Mar 9, 2026
Copilot AI changed the title Decline GSTIN data harvesting request — privacy/legal violation Decline GSTIN bulk data harvesting — privacy, legal, and ToS violation Mar 9, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants