Skip to content

33515 updating the old COOPS outputs to the modern templates#4496

Open
vysakh-menon-aot wants to merge 2 commits into
bcgov:mainfrom
vysakh-menon-aot:feature/33515
Open

33515 updating the old COOPS outputs to the modern templates#4496
vysakh-menon-aot wants to merge 2 commits into
bcgov:mainfrom
vysakh-menon-aot:feature/33515

Conversation

@vysakh-menon-aot

@vysakh-menon-aot vysakh-menon-aot commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Issue #: /bcgov/entity#33515

Description of changes:
image

image image

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of the lear license (Apache 2.0).

@kialj876 kialj876 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey Vysakh, can we condense the templates? It looks like BC and CP are almost the exact same now. All my comments below are to do with that

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like this is the exact same as the bc address layout now? Can we combine cp / bc (add the records if clause here and update bc to use this template / remove 'bc-address-change' folder?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That was my original plan. Waiting for few UX confirmation regarding the alignment of corps and coop design

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

updated to use common template for coop and corps. waiting for UX confirmation on some details, will update accordingly

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same thing for this? It looks like the only differences could be applied to the BC version as well?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

And this too up until line 46?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

And here - exact same as bcAddressChange

@kialj876 kialj876 Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

and same here with bcDirectorChange

@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
35.2% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 3%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants