README: refresh stale 'Scaffold' status line - #43
Merged
Conversation
The size-trend result is reproduced, plotted, and written up (RESULTS.md, the Substack post, docs/note.md), so the 'Scaffold' status was stale. Point it at the actual result and the open issues for larger rosters.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
## Statusline still read "Scaffold.", but the repo has a reproduced size-trend result (with a hero figure above the fold), aRESULTS.md, a published Substack write-up, and a formaldocs/note.md. Updated the one line to reflect that and point at the open issues for the larger-roster / cross-architecture follow-ups.Docs-only, one line. No findings or results changed.