-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 492
Add commit retry and concurrency validation for writes #3320
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
lawofcycles
wants to merge
9
commits into
apache:main
Choose a base branch
from
lawofcycles:feat/commit-retry-and-validation
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
43337e6
Add commit retry with data conflict validation
lawofcycles b81a1c1
Add validation guards and isolation level property routing
lawofcycles c26d865
Fix mypy errors in test_commit_retry
lawofcycles 3d32e32
Stabilize test_commit_retry_on_commit_failed
lawofcycles 4d29a07
Fix case-insensitive delete regression and improve retry loop
lawofcycles 555670c
Debug: investigate CI-only test failure in memory catalog
lawofcycles b47d0e3
Debug: investigate CI-only test failure in memory catalog
lawofcycles f7550d1
Debug: investigate CI-only test failure in memory catalog
lawofcycles ca5f652
Fix patch.object targeting wrong Transaction class in CI
lawofcycles File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
suggestion: Here
AssertTableUUIDis appended toself._requirementswithin each retry loop, but below in_rebuild_snapshot_updatesit's removed again with:This can be simplified by moving
self._requirements += (AssertTableUUID(uuid=self.table_metadata.table_uuid),)outside the for-loop and updating the line in_rebuild_snapshot_updatesto simply:The reason being is that
AssertTableUUIDwould remain constant the whole time, so we're simply adding and removing it within each retry.