-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Safeguarding: SELF DV/SA 999 parity, CHILD_AT_RISK_EXIT wiring, professional regression tests #21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6b1478f
docs(backlog): record PR #20 merge, Item 57 delivered, Item 78 added
camlambert2000 f274f2a
feat(safeguarding): add 999 line to SELF DV and SA exits for parity
camlambert2000 be11c58
refactor(safeguarding): thread userType through CHILD_AT_RISK_EXIT ca…
camlambert2000 bb73d03
test(safeguarding): add Male and LGBTQ+ professional regression tests…
camlambert2000 f9d7f93
chore(backlog): mark items 75, 74, 77 complete; raise PR #21; add ite…
camlambert2000 549a71a
Merge branch 'main' into staging
camlambert2000 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The test loops
['SELF', 'PROFESSIONAL']and the comment says "Both registers must fall through to the base entry". There are actually three registers, and SUPPORTER is the one not asserted. It resolves to base by the same path, so behaviour is correct, but since the point of the test is to guard the wiring against a future variant being added, adding'SUPPORTER'to the loop would lock all three registers rather than two. One-word change to the array.