Update range-loop.odin

[rmattson]

Thanks for putting together the odinbyexample site -- I found it earlier today, and it's nice to see the start to this. Just a minor note here:

Odin's index value comes second, not first (as you would see in Go). See https://odin-lang.org/docs/overview/#range-based-for-loop for the examples there, under the "Alternatively a second index value can be added" section.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: ec6e46be-72ea-482c-96aa-8cf3e63dc2c8

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 73243bb and 4671b32.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• examples/range-loop/range-loop.odin

---

📝 Walkthrough

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Examples
  • Updated the range-loop example to demonstrate the revised ordering of loop variables.
  • Adjusted the printed output to reflect the swapped value and index bindings.

Walkthrough

The range-loop example now binds its iteration components to value and index in the opposite order while keeping the loop body unchanged.

Changes

Range loop example

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Swap range-loop bindings examples/range-loop/range-loop.odin	The loop changes from index, value to value, index when iterating over numbers; the print statements remain unchanged.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Suggested reviewers: mrsheerluck

Poem

A bunny hops through numbers bright,
Swapping bindings left and right.
Value first and index near,
The loop prints on, crisp and clear.
Thump-thump—examples cheer!

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title matches the changed file and the range-loop ordering fix, though it is a bit generic.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description accurately explains the index/value ordering fix and cites the relevant Odin docs.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}