Skip to content

⚡ Bolt: [performance improvement] Replace O(N) includes with O(1) Set lookup in voter APIs#394

Draft
yeboster wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bolt/optimize-array-filtering-13373394845453975963
Draft

⚡ Bolt: [performance improvement] Replace O(N) includes with O(1) Set lookup in voter APIs#394
yeboster wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bolt/optimize-array-filtering-13373394845453975963

Conversation

@yeboster

@yeboster yeboster commented Jul 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

💡 What: Replaced Array.prototype.includes() inside array .filter() loops with Set.prototype.has() in the voter addition and removal APIs (src/routes/api/proposals/voters/add/+server.ts and src/routes/api/proposals/voters/remove/+server.ts).
🎯 Why: The original implementation iterated over an array and performed an O(N) .includes() lookup for each element, leading to O(NM) time complexity. As the number of domain owners and voters grows, this significantly slows down the API.
📊 Impact: Expected performance improvement changes complexity from O(N
M) to O(N+M). This drastically reduces CPU utilization and response time for large datasets.
🔬 Measurement: Verify by executing the unit tests (pnpm test:unit --run) and optionally benchmarking the /api/proposals/voters/add and /api/proposals/voters/remove endpoints locally with large mocked arrays to observe the execution time reduction.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 13373394845453975963 started by @yeboster

… lookup in voter APIs

Replaced `Array.prototype.includes()` inside array `.filter()` loops with `Set.prototype.has()` in the voter addition and removal APIs (`src/routes/api/proposals/voters/add/+server.ts` and `src/routes/api/proposals/voters/remove/+server.ts`).

This solves an O(N*M) time complexity issue when checking large arrays.

Co-authored-by: yeboster <[email protected]>
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jul 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
app Error Error Jul 5, 2026 7:48pm

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant