⚡ Bolt: [performance improvement] Optimize handleSort in DomainsTable#389
⚡ Bolt: [performance improvement] Optimize handleSort in DomainsTable#389yeboster wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Co-authored-by: yeboster <[email protected]>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
1 participant
What: Replaced the array allocation and destructuring in the
Array.prototype.sort()callback insidehandleSortwith simple scalar assignments and mathematical multiplier logic for ascending/descending sorting.Why: Instantiating new arrays inside a tight sorting loop causes heavy garbage collection overhead, especially as the number of elements increases.
Impact: Reduces memory allocations during sorting, significantly speeding up the table sort operation and saving CPU cycles.
Measurement: Profile the sort function execution time; performance scales better with domain array length.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 10105898784409976396 started by @yeboster