⚡ Optimize HistoryManager get_entry with a secondary dictionary index#9
⚡ Optimize HistoryManager get_entry with a secondary dictionary index#9LebToki wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
💡 What: Added a secondary index (
_history_indexdictionary) that maps entry IDs to their correspondingGenerationHistoryobjects. This dictionary is kept in sync during additions, deletions, clears, and history loading/saving operations.🎯 Why: The previous
get_entrymethod used a linear search loop over the list (O(n)), which caused unnecessary CPU usage and performance bottlenecks when there are many items in the history. Looking up an entry by ID is now a dictionary get operation, which resolves inO(1)time complexity.📊 Measured Improvement:
I created a script (
benchmark_history.py) to measure the baseline performance before optimizing and again after the implementation. The benchmark added 1000 items to theHistoryManagerand looked up all 1000 items 100 times in a loop.PR created automatically by Jules for task 12576992903923854241 started by @LebToki