Add create run logs

[ramilamparo]

Resovles: https://github.com/Hypersequent/tms-issues/issues/2471

[claude]

Claude finished @ramilamparo's task in 1m 17s —— View job

---

Review: PR #68 — Add create run logs

• Gather PR context and diff
• Launch specialized review subagents
• Aggregate findings and post review
• Clean up outdated bot comments

Result: Approved — clean, well-structured addition that follows all established codebase patterns. No security, performance, or code quality issues found. One minor inline suggestion about adding a missing-subcommand-help test entry for the new runs logs intermediate command group.

[AndrianBdn]

I think it would be great to explain what is run log - it is term we coined ourself, there is no alternatives as far as I know. AI system / user could confuse this with something else, so both in SKILL.md / README.md

[claude]

Claude finished @ramilamparo's task in 2m 3s —— View job

---

Review: PR #68 — Add create run logs

• Gather PR context and diff
• Launch specialized review subagents
• Aggregate findings and post review
• Clean up outdated bot comments

Result: Approved — clean, well-structured addition that follows all established codebase patterns. No security, performance, or code quality issues found. The new commit addresses @AndrianBdn's feedback by adding a clear explanation of what run-level logs are in both README.md and SKILL.md. One minor observation (not blocking) noted in the review about CreateRunLogRequestSchema.comment lacking a .min(1) constraint.

[claude]

Claude finished @ramilamparo's task in 5m 3s —— View job

---

Review: PR #68 — Add create run logs

• Gather PR context and diff
• Launch specialized review subagents
• Aggregate findings and post review
• Clean up outdated bot comments

Result: Approved — clean, well-structured addition that follows all established codebase patterns. The latest commit addresses prior feedback (.min(1) validation, documentation explaining run-level logs). No security, performance, or blocking code quality issues found. Three minor inline suggestions posted: import type usage, simplifying a test with expectValidationError, and the still-unaddressed missing-subcommand-help entry for runs logs.

[hi-rai]

Looks okay, apart from few claude comments that I think would be good to address

[claude]

Claude finished @satvik007's task in 5m 11s —— View job

---

Review: PR #68 — Add create run logs

• Gather PR context and diff
• Launch specialized review subagents
• Aggregate findings and post review
• Clean up outdated bot comments

Result: Approved — clean, well-structured addition that follows all established codebase patterns. No security, performance, or blocking code quality issues found. Three previously posted inline suggestions remain unaddressed (as noted by @hi-rai): import type for CreateRunLogRequest, use expectValidationError helper in the empty-comment test, and add missing-subcommand-help entry for runs logs.

[claude]

Clean, well-structured addition that follows all established codebase patterns. No security, performance, or blocking code quality issues found.

Three previously posted inline suggestions remain unaddressed (as noted by @hi-rai):

1. import type for CreateRunLogRequest (src/commands/api/manifests/runs.ts:8) — Used only as a type assertion; should be type CreateRunLogRequest or replaced with Parameters<typeof api.runs.createLog>[2] to match peer endpoints.

2. Use expectValidationError helper (src/tests/api/runs/logs-create.spec.ts:93-108) — The "rejects empty --comment" test manually reimplements the spy/assert/restore pattern that's already imported and used earlier in the same file.

3. Add missing-subcommand-help entry (src/tests/missing-subcommand-help.spec.ts) — { args: ['api', 'runs', 'logs'], label: 'api runs logs' } should be added to keep help-text test coverage consistent with other intermediate command groups.