feat: add practical mainland payment knowledge base#1
Draft
Fangx-AI wants to merge 3 commits into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
Why
Beginner payment questions need concrete platform conditions, fees, settlement paths, and practical next steps without turning every answer into a long manual. This establishes an evidence-bounded foundation that can be expanded gradually.
User impact
Payment answers can now route by seller identity and payment model, compare named platforms without inventing certainty, and fall back to a plain-language official verification path when evidence is incomplete.
Validation
py -3 -m unittest -v tests.fxskill.test_payment_kb— 97 passedpy -3 scripts/validate_payment_kb.py— 11 profiles validatedquick_validate.py skills/fxskill— Skill is valid