Organize repository and publish AMOS papers#1
Merged
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR reorganizes the repository’s paper and evaluation-document layout to remove duplicates and keep a compact, reproducible structure centered around two canonical PDFs under papers/.
Changes:
- Consolidates paper PDFs and LaTeX sources under
papers/and streamlines the top-level README to link to the two canonical PDFs. - Moves evaluation guidance into
docs/evaluation/and updates cross-references accordingly. - Updates ignore rules to drop generated artifacts while explicitly retaining only the two canonical paper PDFs.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 8 out of 12 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| README.md | Replaces long-form README with links to the two canonical PDFs. |
| papers/research_paper.tex | Updates PDF metadata/title to reflect the new paper naming. |
| papers/design_proposal.tex | Adds a new design proposal LaTeX source under papers/. |
| external_studies/HANDOFF.md | Updates protocol path references after moving evaluation docs. |
| docs/evaluation/independent_evaluation_protocol.md | Updates intake-doc reference to the new docs/evaluation/ location. |
| docs/evaluation/evidence_intake.md | Updates the intake document heading/title. |
| docs/evaluation/artifact_evaluation.md | Updates submission finalization command to point at papers/ and moved docs. |
| CITATION.cff | Updates citation title to match the new naming. |
| .gitignore | Ignores generated document outputs broadly while allowlisting the two canonical paper PDFs. |
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2)
papers/research_paper.tex:25
- The PDF metadata title includes a duplicated prefix ("AMOS: AMOS:"), which is likely a typo and will propagate to the rendered PDF’s document properties.
papers/research_paper.tex:47 - The paper title includes a duplicated prefix ("AMOS: AMOS:"), which is likely unintended and will appear in the rendered manuscript title.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
| @@ -1,95 +1,4 @@ | |||
| # AMOS: A Memory Operating Layer for Continuous Large-Scale Data Analysis Agents | |||
| # AMOS: AMOS: A Memory Operating Layer for Autonomous Data Analysis | |||
| \definecolor{amosgray}{HTML}{F3F4F5} | ||
|
|
||
| \hypersetup{ | ||
| pdftitle={AMOS: AMOS: A Memory Operating Layer for Autonomous Data Analysis}, |
| \begin{document} | ||
|
|
||
| \begin{center} | ||
| {\fontsize{20}{23}\selectfont\bfseries\textcolor{amosblue}{AMOS: AMOS: A Memory Operating Layer\\for Autonomous Data Analysis}}\\[0.45em] |
| cff-version: 1.2.0 | ||
| message: "If you use AMOS, please cite this manuscript." | ||
| title: "AMOS: A Memory Operating Layer for Continuous Large-Scale Data Analysis Agents" | ||
| title: "AMOS: AMOS: A Memory Operating Layer for Autonomous Data Analysis" |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
papers/docs/evaluation/Why
The repository had duplicate manuscripts, compiled output in multiple locations, and generated artifacts mixed with durable source. This change establishes a compact, reproducible layout with exactly two canonical single-column PDFs.
Validation
pytest -q— 85 tests passed