Changed

[Vamsi-o]

Summary

What changed

• Describe what you changed and why.

How to test

• Steps to reproduce / test this PR locally.

Checklist

• I opened this PR from a feature branch (not main)
• CI builds and tests pass (no CI configured yet)
• I added/updated tests if applicable
• I added documentation if applicable

Reviewers

• @Vamsi-o (code owner) will be automatically requested to review.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Style
  • Minor formatting adjustments to configuration files.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Two blank lines added before the "type": "module" field in the HTTP backend's package.json file. No functional changes; purely a whitespace formatting adjustment.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Whitespace formatting apps/http-backend/package.json	Added two blank lines before the "type": "module" field for spacing adjustment

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~1 minute

Suggested reviewers

• TejaBudumuru3

Poem

🐰 Two lines of space, so clean and neat,
In package.json, our formatting beat,
No code was changed, just breathing room,
A subtle touch to tidy the loom! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title 'Changed' is vague and non-descriptive; it does not convey what was actually changed in the pull request.	Replace with a more descriptive title that explains the specific change, such as 'Add whitespace formatting to package.json' or similar.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch New

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR adds two blank lines to the package.json file but provides no clear purpose or description. The generic title "Changed" and unfilled description template suggest this may be an accidental or incomplete pull request.

• Adds unnecessary whitespace to package.json

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[Copilot]

Unnecessary blank lines added. These empty lines add no value to the package.json file and should be removed to maintain clean formatting.

Suggested change

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

apps/http-backend/package.json (1)

16-17: Remove unnecessary blank lines.

Adding two blank lines between devDependencies and type breaks typical JSON formatting conventions where top-level properties are compact with minimal spacing. Consolidate to no blank lines or a single blank line for better alignment with package.json best practices.

Apply this diff to remove the extra blank lines:

  "devDependencies": {
    "@repo/db": "workspace:*",
    "@workspace/typescript-config": "workspace:*"
  },
-
-  
  "type": "module",

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5b99476 and fbdab4f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• apps/http-backend/package.json (1 hunks)