Changing config to better optimize efficiency#271
Merged
Conversation
Member
Author
jdkio
approved these changes
Jul 16, 2026
jdkio
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can you remove .DS_Store from the PR please. Otherwise it looks good. Please make sure to make an issue noting that we need to investigate options for higher angle muons and tracks.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.

This update increases general reconstruction efficiency. The old base efficiency plot is below, followed by the new one on this config, both on a single neutrino event file
Old
New
We also see an increase in the 'good' reco efficiency, which is percentage with correct endpoint and charge id
Old
New
This does come at the cost of narrowing the scan range of the Hough Transform. It now scans from -1.5 to 1.5 slope, or in other words covers from -55 degrees to 55 degrees. This could be expanded and we could instead scan on finer intervals, but that comes at a performance cost. Before approving, I would like someone else to run this on their own edep sim files and ensure it works properly