🎨 Palette: [UX improvement] 비활성화된 작업 버튼에 툴팁 추가

[seonghobae]

💡 What:

• 비활성화된 주요 작업 버튼("분석 시작", "프로젝트 열기", "저장" 등)에 설명용 title 속성(툴팁) 추가.
• en/common.json 및 ko/common.json 파일에 툴팁으로 사용될 다국어 설명 문자열 추가.

🎯 Why:

• 버튼이 비활성화되었을 때 시각적인 표시뿐만 아니라 툴팁을 통해 이유(예: "분석을 시작하기 전에 오디오를 선택하세요")를 알려주면 마우스 호버 시 사용자에게 더 명확한 피드백을 제공합니다.

📸 Before/After:

• 변경 전: 분석 진행 중이거나 오디오가 선택되지 않았을 때 비활성화된 "분석 시작" 버튼 위에 마우스를 올려도 아무 설명이 나타나지 않음.
• 변경 후: 마우스를 올리면 "분석을 시작하기 전에 오디오를 선택하세요" 등의 툴팁이 나타남.

♿ Accessibility:

• 마우스 사용자가 비활성화 상태의 원인을 파악할 수 있도록 돕는 시각적 힌트를 추가했습니다. (스크린 리더는 aria-disabled 및 상태를 통해 판단하지만, 시각 정보 의존 사용자에게 유용함)

---

PR created automatically by Jules for task 6605306366309814551 started by @seonghobae

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[Copilot]

Copilot wasn't able to review any files in this pull request.

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[github-actions]

Pull request overview

OpenCode exhausted the configured model pool without a usable current-head review conclusion. This is not approval evidence, so the PR is blocked until a source-backed review can establish approval sufficiency or identify concrete fixes.

Findings

1. HIGH review evidence:1 - OpenCode could not establish approval sufficiency

• Problem: every configured model path failed to produce a usable current-head control block.
• Root cause: model execution, timeout, export, normalization, or approval-gate validation did not complete after exponential retry across the configured model pool.
• Impact: approving from deterministic check state alone would miss PR-intent mismatches, missing files, edge-case bugs, robustness gaps, UX/DX regressions, security issues, and CodeGraph-backed base/head flow changes.
• Fix: rerun OpenCode after model availability recovers, or update the PR with the missing files, tests, docs, generated artifacts, and verification evidence needed for a source-backed review conclusion.
• Regression test: keep the approval gate posting REQUEST_CHANGES, not APPROVE or check-only failure, when no model produces a valid current-head review.

Summary

• Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
• Reason: coverage-evidence passed and peer GitHub Checks completed without failures, but no model produced a valid review control block.
• Deterministic evidence checked but not used for approval: current-head changed-file evidence (bounded current-head evidence); coverage-evidence result success; peer checks from statusCheckRollup excluding this OpenCode check.
• Model outcome: model_pool=exhausted; selected_model=none.
• Head SHA: 7adf97d406f710e6b7a87665999a78ce290c688b
• Workflow run: 28510652696
• Workflow attempt: 1

No PR approval was posted because model-output failure is not evidence that the PR has no blockers.

Inline comment note: OpenCode could not find an added RIGHT-side diff line for this PR, so the model-exhaustion blocker is attached to the PR review body instead of a file line.

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  Evidence["OpenCode evidence"] --> Review["Current PR review path"]
  Review --> Verify["Required checks"]

Loading

[github-actions]

OpenCode Review Overview

• Head SHA: 7adf97d406f710e6b7a87665999a78ce290c688b
• Workflow run: 28510652696
• Workflow attempt: 1
• Gate result: REQUEST_CHANGES (approval step)

Pull request overview

OpenCode exhausted the configured model pool without a usable current-head review conclusion. This is not approval evidence, so the PR is blocked until a source-backed review can establish approval sufficiency or identify concrete fixes.

Findings

1. HIGH review evidence:1 - OpenCode could not establish approval sufficiency

• Problem: every configured model path failed to produce a usable current-head control block.
• Root cause: model execution, timeout, export, normalization, or approval-gate validation did not complete after exponential retry across the configured model pool.
• Impact: approving from deterministic check state alone would miss PR-intent mismatches, missing files, edge-case bugs, robustness gaps, UX/DX regressions, security issues, and CodeGraph-backed base/head flow changes.
• Fix: rerun OpenCode after model availability recovers, or update the PR with the missing files, tests, docs, generated artifacts, and verification evidence needed for a source-backed review conclusion.
• Regression test: keep the approval gate posting REQUEST_CHANGES, not APPROVE or check-only failure, when no model produces a valid current-head review.

Summary

• Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
• Reason: coverage-evidence passed and peer GitHub Checks completed without failures, but no model produced a valid review control block.
• Deterministic evidence checked but not used for approval: current-head changed-file evidence (bounded current-head evidence); coverage-evidence result success; peer checks from statusCheckRollup excluding this OpenCode check.
• Model outcome: model_pool=exhausted; selected_model=none.
• Head SHA: 7adf97d406f710e6b7a87665999a78ce290c688b
• Workflow run: 28510652696
• Workflow attempt: 1

No PR approval was posted because model-output failure is not evidence that the PR has no blockers.

Inline comment note: OpenCode could not find an added RIGHT-side diff line for this PR, so the model-exhaustion blocker is attached to the PR review body instead of a file line.

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  Evidence["OpenCode evidence"] --> Review["Current PR review path"]
  Review --> Verify["Required checks"]

Loading

[seonghobae]

Superseded by #530. The replacement keeps the disabled tooltip accessibility fix focused and verified.

[seonghobae]

Closing as superseded by clean replacement #530.

[google-labs-jules]

Superseded by #530. The replacement keeps the disabled tooltip accessibility fix focused and verified.

Understood. Acknowledging that this work is superseded by #530 and stopping work on this task.

[google-labs-jules]

Closing as superseded by clean replacement #530.

Understood. Acknowledging the closure.