Labels

• dependencies

  dependencies

  Pull requests that update a dependency files

• environment: production

  environment: production

  I found it when using app on the production environment

• environment: staging

  environment: staging

  I found it when using app on the staging environment

• priority: critical

  priority: critical

  Users are blocked. Fix it as soon as possible

• priority: high

  priority: high

  People can work around the issue but it’s painful

• priority: low

  priority: low

  The issue reports cosmetic items, formatting, spelling, colors, etc.

• priority: medium

  priority: medium

  People can use the app but this bug negatively affects their user experience.

• resolution: answered

  resolution: answered

  It was a question and it's answered

• resolution: by design

  resolution: by design

  It's not a bug, it's a feature

• resolution: duplicate

  resolution: duplicate

  We have another identical issue, so we linked it here

• resolution: external

  resolution: external

  It was a real bug, but not in the code in our repo. We linked source of the bug

• resolution: not applicable

  resolution: not applicable

  The issue is not relevant to code in this repo and is not an external issue

• resolution: not reproducible

  resolution: not reproducible

  We can't reproduce the issue, so it's closed for now

• resolution: won't fix

  resolution: won't fix

  We don't think this issue is impactful enough to spend time on it

• scope: client

  scope: client

  Requires changes on the client-side of the application

• scope: server

  scope: server

  Requires changes on the server-side of the application

• type: bug

  type: bug

  Something isn't working. We specified it's importance with a priority label

• type: documentation

  type: documentation

  We should add or improve something in docs

• type: feature

  type: feature

  Another new, shiny thing we can have in our app

• type: maintenance

  type: maintenance

  We should make things clearer or removing ambiguity, without changing the functionality

• type: question

  type: question

  The issue is more of a question than a request for new features or a report of broken features

• ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  Does anyone remember what was the main topic of this issue?

• ℹ️ needs information

  ℹ️ needs information

  We need to know something more to continue work on this issue

• ↩️ regression

  ↩️ regression

  The issue is a bug that breaks functionality known to work in previous releases

• ❨╯°□°❩╯︵┻━┻

  ❨╯°□°❩╯︵┻━┻

  It seems impossible for people here to agree on this issue

• 🙏 help wanted

  🙏 help wanted

  We need your extra attention for this issue

• 🧐 cannot reproduce

  🧐 cannot reproduce

  The issue has been reviewed, but we cannot be replicated with the provided information

• 🧸 good first issue

  🧸 good first issue

  New in the repo? It's a perfect issue for you