Updated footer#178
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 22 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe footer becomes a client component with animated AOSSIE branding, GitHub and documentation actions, expanded contact links, external-link attributes, and a simplified MIT license bar with a dynamic year. ChangesFooter redesign
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels: Suggested reviewers: Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@landing-page/src/components/Footer.tsx`:
- Around line 76-78: Update the “View Documentation” anchor in the Footer
component to use the actual documentation URL; if documentation is not yet
available, replace the placeholder with an appropriate TODO marker rather than
leaving href="#".
- Around line 42-53: Externalize every user-visible string in the Footer
component, including the heading text, descriptive paragraph, link labels,
“Developed by AOSSIE,” “Connect,” and the copyright notice, into the project’s
existing i18n resource files. Update the Footer component to read these values
through the established translation mechanism while preserving the current
markup, styling, and line-break behavior.
- Around line 147-150: Remove the target and rel attributes from the mailto
anchor in the Footer component, leaving the href unchanged so it continues to
launch the default email client directly.
- Around line 22-33: Remove the unused NavLinkProps interface and NavLink
component, then remove the now-unused Link import from the file.
- Around line 120-125: Replace the native img element in the Footer component
with Next.js’s imported Image component, adding the next/image import and
passing the imported logo object directly to src. Remove the ESLint suppression
while preserving the existing alt text and styling.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 73de3e3f-bfdf-4990-b22f-295777f61eda
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
landing-page/src/components/Footer.tsx
Screenshots/Recordings:
Checklist
We encourage contributors to use AI tools responsibly when creating Pull Requests. While AI can be a valuable aid, it is essential to ensure that your contributions meet the task requirements, build successfully, include relevant tests, and pass all linters. Submissions that do not meet these standards may be closed without warning to maintain the quality and integrity of the project. Please take the time to understand the changes you are proposing and their impact. AI slop is strongly discouraged and may lead to banning and blocking. Do not spam our repos with AI slop.
Summary by CodeRabbit