Skip to content

chore(sync): regenerate from stark-skills@60f377c - #121

Closed
stark-claude-21s[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
auto/marketplace-sync
Closed

chore(sync): regenerate from stark-skills@60f377c#121
stark-claude-21s[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
auto/marketplace-sync

Conversation

@stark-claude-21s

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Automated regeneration from stark-skills@60f377c2172aada9a31982590cf5f47b8efae533 by the marketplace-sync workflow. Merges once this repo's CI is green.

@stark-claude-21s
stark-claude-21s Bot requested a review from aryeh-stark as a code owner July 27, 2026 15:39
@aryeh-stark

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closing — superseded, and merging it now would regress main.

This auto-sync fired when stark-skills#810 merged, and its substantive content is already on main via #122. Verified byte-identical:

file vs main
vendor/plugins/stark-gh/tools/lib/git.ts same
vendor/plugins/stark-gh/tools/lib/types.ts same
dist/claude/stark-gh/tools/lib/git.ts same

The problem is the base. This branch predates #122 and #123, so git diff main..HEAD is 457 deletions — merging it would remove the plugin-asset version gate added in #123:

 engine/internal/digest/files.go   |  97 ---------
 engine/internal/index/index.go    |  33 +--
 engine/internal/build/build.go    |  12 +-
 index.json                        |  33 +--     (pluginAssets rows stripped)

That gate is what stops a change confined to vendor/plugins/<bundle>/tools/** from shipping under an unchanged bundle version — the exact failure that made this sync necessary in the first place (a lib/git.ts fix sat at 0.1.10 and would never have reached an installed machine).

It also bumps cleanup.md / pr-merge.md / pr-open.md artifact versions to 0.1.11. Those command bodies never changed — only the plugin's vendored tools did — so per the semver policy they should stay at 0.1.10, which is what main has. check-bumps and build --check are both clean there.

Nothing is lost by closing. If a future sync needs to re-run, it should branch from current main.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant