docs: improve doctests for complex number typed arrays in blas/base/wasm

[anandkaranubc]

Progresses #4833
Resolves stdlib-js/metr-issue-tracker#517

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

• improve doctests for complex number instances in blas/base/wasm

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request has the following related issues:

• [RFC]: Improve doctests for complex number typed arrays in documentation examples (tracking issue) #4833
• [RFC]: improve doctests for complex number typed arrays in @stdlib/blas/base/wasm metr-issue-tracker#517

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

• Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines.

AI Assistance

When authoring the changes proposed in this PR, did you use any kind of AI assistance?

• Yes
• No

If you answered "yes" above, how did you use AI assistance?

• Code generation (e.g., when writing an implementation or fixing a bug)
• Test/benchmark generation
• Documentation (including examples)
• Research and understanding

Disclosure

If you answered "yes" to using AI assistance, please provide a short disclosure indicating how you used AI assistance. This helps reviewers determine how much scrutiny to apply when reviewing your contribution. Example disclosures: "This PR was written primarily by Claude Code." or "I consulted ChatGPT to understand the codebase, but the proposed changes were fully authored manually by myself.".

Used a Cursor driven Skill+Workflow to achieve this migration with manual and automated sanity checks.

---

@stdlib-js/reviewers

[stdlib-bot]

Coverage Report

Package	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
blas/base/wasm/ccopy	$\color{green}672/672$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}17/17$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}6/6$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}672/672$ $\color{green}+100.00%$
blas/base/wasm/cscal	$\color{green}694/694$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}17/17$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}6/6$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}694/694$ $\color{green}+100.00%$
blas/base/wasm/csrot	$\color{green}706/706$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}17/17$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}6/6$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}706/706$ $\color{green}+100.00%$
blas/base/wasm/cswap	$\color{green}695/695$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}17/17$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}6/6$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}695/695$ $\color{green}+100.00%$
blas/base/wasm/zcopy	$\color{green}673/673$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}17/17$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}6/6$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}673/673$ $\color{green}+100.00%$
blas/base/wasm/zdrot	$\color{green}706/706$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}17/17$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}6/6$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}706/706$ $\color{green}+100.00%$
blas/base/wasm/zscal	$\color{green}694/694$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}17/17$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}6/6$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}694/694$ $\color{green}+100.00%$
blas/base/wasm/zswap	$\color{green}695/695$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}17/17$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}6/6$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}695/695$ $\color{green}+100.00%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

[anandkaranubc]

The lint error is due to the exceeded character count in repl.txt, which was already there before as well.