chore: add initial plugin folder structure

[BryanttV]

Description

This PR adds the initial plugin folder structure. The purpose is to include CI validations in PRs, but it could be used to test implementations.

Generated using edx-cookiecutters > django-app. Some additional changes were made:

1. Replaced the current README.md with the README.rst
2. Deactivated the codecov patch check (for now), because the checks were failing.
3. Generated the .txt files for the initial base requirements by running make upgrade
4. Included setuptools requirement in the quality checks to solve pylint check failures
5. Included Python 3.11 in the supported versions

[openedx-webhooks]

Thanks for the pull request, @BryanttV!

This repository is currently maintained by @openedx/committers-openedx-authz.

Once you've gone through the following steps feel free to tag them in a comment and let them know that your changes are ready for engineering review.

🔘 Get product approval

If you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.

• If it does, you'll need to submit a product proposal for your contribution, and have it reviewed by the Product Working Group.
  • This process (including the steps you'll need to take) is documented here.
• If it doesn't, simply proceed with the next step.

🔘 Provide context

To help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:

• Dependencies

  This PR must be merged before / after / at the same time as ...

• Blockers

  This PR is waiting for OEP-1234 to be accepted.

• Timeline information

  This PR must be merged by XX date because ...

• Partner information

  This is for a course on edx.org.

• Supporting documentation
• Relevant Open edX discussion forum threads

🔘 Get a green build

If one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green.

Details

---

Where can I find more information?

If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:

• Overview of Review Process for Community Contributions
• Pull Request Status Guide
• Making changes to your pull request

When can I expect my changes to be merged?

Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible.

However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:

• The size and impact of the changes that it introduces
• The need for product review
• Maintenance status of the parent repository

💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

[sarina]

Is this just the cookie-cutter generation or is there something specific you'd like reviewed? Could you provide a self-review with anything you'd like 👀 on ?

[mariajgrimaldi]

Can we update this with a more appropriate description?

[BryanttV]

Thanks @mariajgrimaldi, purpose updated: 17d3802. What do you think?

[BryanttV]

Is this just the cookie-cutter generation or is there something specific you'd like reviewed? Could you provide a self-review with anything you'd like 👀 on ?

Hi @sarina!

I just generated the folder structure with the cookiecutter and then:

1. I replaced the current README.md with the README.rst
2. I deactivated the codecov patch check (for now), because the checks were failing.
3. I generated the .txt files for the initial base requirements by running make upgrade
4. I included setuptools requirement in the quality checks to solve pylint check failures
5. I included Python 3.11 in the supported versions

[mariajgrimaldi]

What about:

Open edX AuthZ provides the architecture and foundations of the authorization framework. It implements the core machinery needed to support consistent authorization across the Open edX ecosystem.

We can also draw inspiration from: https://github.com/openedx/openedx-authz/pull/28/files

[BryanttV]

Thanks for the suggestion! What do you think about: ec2c951

[sarina]

Please remove changes to LICENSE.txt, we already have a LICENSE file (https://github.com/openedx/openedx-authz/blob/main/LICENSE)

[sarina]

Can you remove the other status badge lines per this comment?

[BryanttV]

Removed: 92dbfe3

[BryanttV]

Please remove changes to LICENSE.txt, we already have a LICENSE file (https://github.com/openedx/openedx-authz/blob/main/LICENSE)

Thanks! deleted: 7e7072e

[mariajgrimaldi]

Thank you!

[MaferMazu]

Looks good to me ✨