Skip to content

Add PowerDNS Certbot plugin#550

Closed
ungeskriptet wants to merge 1 commit intolinuxserver:masterfrom
ungeskriptet:certbot-dns-pdns
Closed

Add PowerDNS Certbot plugin#550
ungeskriptet wants to merge 1 commit intolinuxserver:masterfrom
ungeskriptet:certbot-dns-pdns

Conversation

@ungeskriptet
Copy link
Copy Markdown

  • I have read the contributing guideline and understand that I have made the correct modifications

Description:

Add certbot-dns-pdns to the Docker image to allow requesting certificates from Let's encrypt using PowerDNS.

Benefits of this PR and context:

Users can easily request TLS certificates using this plugin.

How Has This Been Tested?

This has been tested by removing the old letsencrypt folder completely and requesting new certificates.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@github-actions github-actions Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for opening this pull request! Be sure to follow the pull request template!

@LinuxServer-CI
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I am a bot, here is the pushed image/manifest for this PR:

ghcr.io/linuxserver/lspipepr-swag:3.3.0-pkg-e6ac6cbe-dev-24fce814263dfaa424ab5ff8357fa708d2106d70-pr-550

@LinuxServer-CI
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I am a bot, here is the pushed image/manifest for this PR:

ghcr.io/linuxserver/lspipepr-swag:3.3.0-pkg-fcfbefb7-dev-064919c58273f5784ab535f73745d64f02c836eb-pr-550

@LinuxServer-CI
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I am a bot, here is the pushed image/manifest for this PR:

ghcr.io/linuxserver/lspipepr-swag:4.0.0-pkg-712d67a0-dev-70a69ff8cda9f8f19567489e8c57210a4d372594-pr-550

@xxbillouxx
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi! Just checking in — any updates on this PR?

@ungeskriptet
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

dunno, it's been open for way to long. i have since switched to NixOS + Lego. feel free to take this PR over

@LinuxServer-CI
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. This might be due to missing feedback from OP. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@LinuxServer-CI
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request is locked due to inactivity

@linuxserver linuxserver locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 30, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants