first draft - statewide vrm/vrh by operator per UZA#1974
Merged
csuyat-dot merged 20 commits intomainfrom Mar 26, 2026
Merged
Conversation
…gatig doesnt work. so makeing new county/uza geometry to feed into tsi scripts
|
nbviewer URLs for impacted notebooks: |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
issue
Merging in work in progress. Not closing issue yet.
Read in latest TSI data, joined to NTD agency data that included agency county. Saved data to GCS. As of now, can see "how much vrm/vrh each agency provides in a UZA.
Still developing a new geometry ( UZA-to- County boundaries ) to feed into TSI script. then will rerun this analysis.