Skip to content

Add CSF_Wiki scaffold: raw-folder LLM wiki for NIST CSF 2.0 - #329

Open
evanoseen wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
79-csf-llm-wiki
Open

Add CSF_Wiki scaffold: raw-folder LLM wiki for NIST CSF 2.0#329
evanoseen wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
79-csf-llm-wiki

Conversation

@evanoseen

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Addresses CPAtoCybersecurity/catalyst#79.

Karpathy-style raw-folder wiki: drop source material into raw/, a Claude Code session organizes it into linked markdown in wiki/. No vector DB, no embeddings, no extra infra — just markdown + Obsidian-compatible [[wikilinks]]. Obsidian is optional, only a graph viewer on top.

Confirmed community-facing (not internal) by @CPAtoCybersecurity in the issue thread.

What's here:

  • CSF_Wiki/raw/{nist_csf,simply_cyber,threat_briefing}/ — drop zones for future source material
  • CSF_Wiki/wiki/ — seeded with a real proof-of-concept: GOVERN function index → GV.OC-01 + GV.SC-04 subcategory nodes, cross-linked, sourced from the canonical CSF text already in sample_csv_exports/yyyy-mm-dd_CSF_Profile.csv
  • CSF_Wiki/CONTRIBUTING.md — how new raw material becomes linked wiki nodes (naming convention, linking rule, no-orphans rule, Security+ extension path)
  • CSF_Wiki/README.md — public-facing explainer

Not in this PR: full coverage of the other 5 CSF functions, and no real Simply Cyber / threat-briefing content yet — both need real source material dropped into raw/ as a follow-up.

Nothing in src/stores/* was touched — the wiki reads from existing data, doesn't fork it.

Karpathy-style raw folder in, linked markdown wiki out. Seeds two
real Subcategory nodes (GV.OC-01, GV.SC-04) cross-linked to a GOVERN
function index, sourced from sample_csv_exports canonical CSF text.
Contribution instructions in CSF_Wiki/CONTRIBUTING.md.

Confirmed community-facing by repo owner in #79.
…reference

Public link checkers get a 404 hitting a private repo's issue URL -
same wall a community reader would hit. Reference kept as plain text.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant