Skip to content

meta: 2026-07-30 residual-work sweep — index (#647-#660) #661

Description

@vibechoom

Index for a residual-work sweep run on 2026-07-30, in the same shape as #456's code-climate sweep. Filing the index so the cluster is skippable as a unit rather than reading as fourteen unrelated tickets.

Nothing here is a new feature request. Every item is work that was already started, promised, or documented and then left behind — a deferral whose follow-up never happened, a doc that describes a tree that no longer exists, or plumbing that was built and never wired.

Method, and what it is worth

Four blind sweeps ran independently over the workspace, each with a different modality so none could see what the others surfaced:

  1. in-tree TODO/FIXME/"for now"/"stand-in" markers and their surrounding code
  2. deferred scope announced in the last 60 merged PR bodies, then checked for a successor that never came
  3. documentation drift — CLAUDE.md, etc/*/README.md, docs/superpowers/, docs/live-verify.md — every checkable factual claim verified against the current tree
  4. built-but-unwired plumbing: public accessors, effect variants, and config options with zero consumers

Each sweep's output then went through a hostile stage that had to dedup against all ~400 open and closed issues, confirm the work had not since been done, and actively try to refute the finding. 44 candidates went in; 20 were killed — as duplicates of existing issues, as work already quietly shipped, or as false positives from the search technique. The 24 survivors are clustered here into 14 issues.

I then re-verified the load-bearing citation of every cluster against HEAD myself before filing. That pass corrected at least one earlier finding in the same family (a sleep(2s) that looked like a retry loop and is actually a one-shot debounce), so treat the surviving citations as checked rather than asserted — but the severity ratings are judgement, not measurement.

The issues

Wiring that was built and never connected

Stubs and duplication left behind

Documentation that is actively wrong

Sequencing notes

Severity, honestly

None of these is a crash or a data-loss bug. The medium ratings are mostly misleading-to-a-reader rather than broken-for-a-user: a plugin author who declares Capability::Niri and gets silence, or a contributor who reads CLAUDE.md and looks for a file that is now a directory. The documentation items are rated the way they are because this repo's docs are load-bearing for both humans and agents working in it.

Pick from this rather than working it top to bottom — it is a menu, not a queue.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    code-climateGrounded finding from a code-climate / architecture audit sweep

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions