This is more if a potential issue/reminder than a confirmed one. I noticed that a route's AS path can contain both the segment type AS_SEQUENCE and AS_SET. My code only handles one type. That was not very smart of me because I know that the AS_SET is populated when aggregated and isn't modified further. So passing that summary would have to mean an AS_SET is also present.
I have to come back and validate the code.
This is more if a potential issue/reminder than a confirmed one. I noticed that a route's AS path can contain both the segment type AS_SEQUENCE and AS_SET. My code only handles one type. That was not very smart of me because I know that the AS_SET is populated when aggregated and isn't modified further. So passing that summary would have to mean an AS_SET is also present.
I have to come back and validate the code.