You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently there is no example showcasing the use of bitwise data. Technically this datatype is applicable to both DPP and DPS.
It is also technically feasible for bitwise DPS to be utilised as group definition, rather than a list of indices. This would only reduce requisite space for groups that select more than 1/32 of streamlines, and unlike a list of indices it would mean that the number of elements cannot be inferred without reading the data, but it's nevertheless worth discussing the prospect, and explicitly rejecting if that's the consensus.
Currently there is no example showcasing the use of bitwise data. Technically this datatype is applicable to both DPP and DPS.
It is also technically feasible for bitwise DPS to be utilised as group definition, rather than a list of indices. This would only reduce requisite space for groups that select more than 1/32 of streamlines, and unlike a list of indices it would mean that the number of elements cannot be inferred without reading the data, but it's nevertheless worth discussing the prospect, and explicitly rejecting if that's the consensus.