Replies: 1 comment
|
For testing and tuning purposes, tests with |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Experimenting with dataset predicting assessment Z-score as last item to personality binary responses for the other columns
data_example.csv
Observation: This bug repeats for
ElasticNetCVandLassoCVinGram matrix passed in via 'precompute' parameter did not pass validation when a single element was checked - please check that it was computed properly. For element (283,284) we computed -22.94281768798828 but the user-supplied value was -22.94300651550293.astype(np.float32)is unknown to be useful or not prior to the edit.Observation:
GammaRegressor,BayesianRidge,TweedieRegressorall do not collapse redundant columns to Zero.ElasticNetCVhas ... live variables,LassoLarsIChas 292 live variables,LassoLarsCVhas 282 live variables, but more variables means more accurate in terms of RMSE or R^2. A second run withrandom_state=15shows 340, 295 and 289 variables, which is slightly different.random_stateis adjusted. This also can cause different configuration of noise reduction. https://www.scikit-yb.org/en/latest/api/model_selection/rfecv.htmlAll reactions