Skip to content

Collect second external redacted field report #84

Description

@saagpatel

Goal

Collect a second external, redacted, config-only MCPAudit field report from a meaningfully different setup or downstream consumer path.

Current release/context

MCPAudit v1.13.1 is live. The generator-to-auditor proof packet is now on main:
https://github.com/saagpatel/MCPAudit/blob/main/docs/MCP-TRUST-PACKET.md

The trust packet explains the public story: mcpforge can scaffold or generate a reproducible MCP server, MCPAudit audits the trust boundary, and bridge-db stays local dogfood/receipt infrastructure rather than a public product claim. This second report still needs to come from a meaningfully different setup or consumer path than #83.

Send this ask

Use the second-tester message here:
https://github.com/saagpatel/MCPAudit/blob/main/docs/EXTERNAL-OUTREACH-MESSAGES.md#direct-ask-for-second-tester

Request packet:
https://github.com/saagpatel/MCPAudit/blob/main/docs/EXTERNAL-FIELD-REPORT-REQUEST.md

Safe example shape:
https://github.com/saagpatel/MCPAudit/blob/main/docs/FIELD-REPORTS.md#minimal-public-example

Public field-report template:
https://github.com/saagpatel/MCPAudit/issues/new?template=field_report.md

Safe collection path

python3 -m pip install --upgrade mcp-permission-audit
mcp-audit --version
mcp-audit scan --skip-connect --json mcp-audit-field-report.json --redact

Acceptance criteria

  • Report comes from a different environment, MCP client mix, or consumer workflow than the first accepted field report.
  • Report states MCPAudit version, OS, MCP client names, approximate server count, and whether a JSON/SARIF/dashboard/CI consumer parsed it.
  • Snippet follows the safe example shape and is redacted: no credential values, private paths, internal hostnames, private URLs, customer names, workspace names, or proprietary prompt/resource/tool/schema text.
  • Reporter confirms whether the redacted shape can become a public fixture.
  • Maintainer records whether it affects config-health fixtures, field-report fixtures, consumer examples, docs only, or no code.

Notes

This is the second required external signal before a beta label can be reconsidered. Solo evidence and the trust packet improve confidence, but they do not close this issue.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    beta-evidenceEvidence needed before beta or release-candidate decisionsfield-reportRedacted external field reports and beta evidencegood first issueGood for newcomershelp wantedExtra attention is needed

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions