Help validate MCPAudit beta readiness with a redacted field report #123
saagpatel
announced in
Announcements
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
MCPAudit is looking for two redacted config-only field reports before moving toward beta.
If you use MCP servers with Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, VSCode, Windsurf, or another MCP client, this should take a few minutes:
Then open a redacted field-report issue:
https://github.com/saagpatel/MCPAudit/issues/new?template=field_report.md
The scan is config-only: it should not spawn MCP servers or contact remote endpoints.
Please redact credentials, private paths, internal hostnames, private URLs, customer names, workspace names, and proprietary prompt/resource/tool/schema text.
Details:
https://github.com/saagpatel/MCPAudit/blob/main/docs/EXTERNAL-FIELD-REPORT-REQUEST.md
Safe example shape:
https://github.com/saagpatel/MCPAudit/blob/main/docs/FIELD-REPORTS.md#minimal-public-example
Proof packet:
https://github.com/saagpatel/MCPAudit/blob/main/docs/MCP-TRUST-PACKET.md
Tracker:
Solo evidence and generated demos help, but they do not replace external reports. The beta gate stays two accepted redacted reports from setups outside the maintainer checkout.
All reactions